i would like to disagree with the 'less experience' part, tomdbest147. cyril started magic as a very young child and his mentors were reputable magicians.
from
www.cyrilmagic.com/us:
"at age 6 when a family friend took him to Las Vegas to see a magic show. He was immediately hooked and began to practice magic everyday, often to the dismay of his parents and teachers. As a young teenager Cyril was accepted into the youth program at California's famous Magic Castle where, surrounded by his magic mentors, he began to gain skills that would help him to become a professional performer."
when u first started learning magic, you would perform magic almost immediately on your classamtes or friends or maybe even teachers. Let's say he started magic at 10 and he is now 23, he would have easily gained 13 years of experience eprforming magic. the way he presents his magic is so good that i can watch it 10 times and not feel bored at all. his magic is one that can fool fellow magicians as well as laymen. look at his routines you can see that he has a very good sleight of hand. performing in front of tv is the same as performing in front of a crowd, and it is the same as performing for his classmates and his friends.i would not say he does not have good experience. i would say david blaine is worse than him. david blaine is just so boring. when the tv channel broadcasted his show a second time, i thought i knew how he did most of his tricks and decided to change the channel. but cyril would not be the most experienced magician, of course. amongst the 3, i would place cyril first, followed by criss angel then david blaine. but all 3 of them are good performers, maybe im just not into the gothic type of presentation and i just dont find david blaine interesting