talkmagic.co.uk

by **Pcwizme** » Jul 25th, '06, 00:19

i was just about to edit that LOL

by **Mandrake** » Jul 25th, '06, 17:28

NB The over-large sigs referred to earlier have been removed. Please bear in mind that TM is a Discussion Forum which means we should be using words rather than images in our posts.

by **Stephen Ward** » Jul 25th, '06, 22:54

good idea, as i said i will remove my with pleasure just say the word Mandrake!

by **Mandrake** » Jul 26th, '06, 09:22

At 7748 bytes yours is quite small (sorry, you know what I mean :oops:

!) and is discrete but effective so there are absolutely no problems with it. The ones which are the size of a house present different problems and, as has been said, just clutter the thread with images thus tending to hide the text and discussion aspect.

by **Blumunky** » Jul 26th, '06, 13:30

Is mine OK? I just saw the thread after adding mine...

by **katrielalex** » Jul 26th, '06, 14:12

And ditto, how about this one?

by **seige** » Jul 26th, '06, 14:47

katrielalex wrote:And ditto, how about this one?

Pointlessly big

Would be just as effective if it were smaller and less obtrusive!

by **katrielalex** » Jul 26th, '06, 14:55

True...it's gone anyway as I don't think it was that good. There's not really much point having an image for no reason o_0.

cheers,

Kati

by **Mandrake** » Jul 26th, '06, 15:06

Blumunky wrote:Is mine OK? I just saw the thread after adding mine...

If you could get yours down to the same physical dimensions as the ones from seige and stephenmagic it would be better. At the moment the large sigs (not just yours!) tend block the text and the eye skips over a lot of the posts as it seems to be all just images.

by **Blumunky** » Jul 26th, '06, 20:25

Ok, I'll see what i can do...

by **Perfelti** » Jul 27th, '06, 16:19

is mine still too big???

by **Mandrake** » Jul 27th, '06, 16:28

You're getting there! Any chance of a little less height - perhaps 2/3rds of above? As you can see, with one line of text above it still tends to overshadow things a bit.

by **katrielalex** » Jul 27th, '06, 16:28

Perfelti, seems to me that the thing about your signature is that it has no point whatsoever. It's just a few pictures of Criss spliced into a photoshop image. Why not just put I like Criss Angel in your signature and not have an image at all? I know what he looks like!

Sorry to be harsh but I really don't see the point...

Kati

by **seige** » Jul 27th, '06, 16:37

katrielalex wrote:Perfelti, seems to me that the thing about your signature is that it has no point whatsoever. It's just a few pictures of Criss spliced into a photoshop image. Why not just put I like Criss Angel in your signature and not have an image at all? I know what he looks like!

Sorry to be harsh but I really don't see the point...

Kati

And aside from all else, it's now hideously deformed because its aspect ratio is wrong.

by **nickj** » Jul 27th, '06, 19:36

seige wrote:And aside from all else, it's now hideously deformed because its aspect ratio is wrong.

Actually, it's now correct, they actually strech him out for tv.

I might be mistaken about that of course.

talkmagic.co.uk

Irritating images in signatures

Who is online