Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support
MickyScouse wrote:Ah, so are you saying that we won't be able to start until we have all the clues?
Tomo wrote:MickyScouse wrote:Ah, so are you saying that we won't be able to start until we have all the clues?
You can start deciphering it now, but there will be seven parts in total. His web site has a forum dedicated to discussing it, but after a few early brick walls, it's gone a bit quiet. What it really needs is the input of a good amateur cryptologist.
Tomo wrote:MickyScouse wrote:Ah, so are you saying that we won't be able to start until we have all the clues?
You can start deciphering it now, but there will be seven parts in total. His web site has a forum dedicated to discussing it, but after a few early brick walls, it's gone a bit quiet. What it really needs is the input of a good amateur cryptologist.
Lawrence wrote:Tomo wrote:MickyScouse wrote:Ah, so are you saying that we won't be able to start until we have all the clues?
You can start deciphering it now, but there will be seven parts in total. His web site has a forum dedicated to discussing it, but after a few early brick walls, it's gone a bit quiet. What it really needs is the input of a good amateur cryptologist.
My Maths Degree has a module in cryptography, along with number theory (it helps). It's irritating that the lure of a good code is making me want to buy them...
anicetus wrote:Or an expert in the Golden Dawn
No...not yet anyway. We don't need to know anything about Crowley, etc at this stage. I think I said that on Paul's Forum.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests