ruben wrote:next question please.
- Perhaps Im missing something here, but what was the point of that post ?
Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support
ruben wrote:next question please.
Nikkolas wrote:To most average pople, Angel's stunts are amazing.
Yet to people on this and many other magic-related forums, he is a joke.
I just am wondering why this is? Is it because he's "mainstream"? Or are the quality of his stunts really just poor? I've heard all sorts of different views in my search before I posted this topic so I'm just looking for a straight answer on how good people think Criss' acts are and why you think as you do.
Conversely, if we all thought he was the dog's danglies but the paying public didn't, he'd be busking on subways with a scruffy dog on a bit of string.A_n_t wrote:Laypeople pay the bills at the end of the day not magicians so the whole (heavily discussed) subject is kind of moot.
Mandrake wrote:According to the recect edition of Magic magazine, the Vegas show has changed considerably since the first performance, a lot of the Cirque features have been removed and replaced by more Angel Magic Show stuff. The reviewer originally thought the show was awful but now says on balance it's far better, although he queried the wisdom of removing some of the original parts of the show.
themagicwand wrote: But he is certainly not adverse to using camera tricks, stooges and clever editing on his TV show. Hope this helps.
samfairweathermagic wrote:themagicwand wrote: But he is certainly not adverse to using camera tricks, stooges and clever editing on his TV show. Hope this helps.
i disagree when he walked on water he had stooges but thats about all i can say for sure
Return to Magicians' Hall of Fame
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests