Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support
jim ferguson wrote:Its not. I think you may have read the post wrong (they are similar). This thread is about the difference between a standard exp**ded sh**l, and those ones you can apparently flash from the other side (I've never used one of these). The OP also mentions a copper/silver fli**er.
The thread you're looking for is about the difference between one sided and two sided "cigarette through coin" gaffs - which is in miscellaneous.
Jim
Craig Browning wrote:I know for fact I've responded to this same exact question recently, I thought it was here
I'm not saying that's I've done Cig thru Quarter for a long time, BUT. . . my first one cost me less than $10.00 U.S. cash
The two styles you speak of have, for years, reflected the Johnson (the one with the ugly backside) and the Sterling (the full back flap). Before this you would also have the stock real coin with a hole drilled through the center ala Slydini.
I've used all three and then some over the years and the only real difference is in being able to instantly flip the coin over once the cigarette is removed, and show the opposite side, it's a very subtle and unnecessary convincer in the majority of cases. Too, that particular design tends to have far more mechanical down time than the other EXCEPT in those cases where certain idiots decide to see just how far the trap opens before it snaps. . . don't laugh, it happens.
There is one other method that is highly sought after and to my knowledge fewer than a dozen were ever made; they were handcrafted by a Jeweler in California as special gifts to a handful of magic legends. To my knowledge, it is the only version that could be held by a spectator that is not familiar with the method and yet, a visible penetration was possible. I know that at least two of the people that had a copy of this coin are now deceased so I'm uncertain who their copies ended up. The jeweler in question was known for making the best gaffed coins ever released. . . not just in the general workmanship but the ability to make gaffed coins "ring" properly rather than clunk or sound flat. You'd pay through the nose for his stuff, but it was priceless!
jim ferguson wrote:I forgot to mention - while we're on the subject of this effect, Michael Ammar has always done this with a pencil and has recently unveiled a brand new gimmicked coin which apparently uses space age material.
The method alows a pencil to penetrate the coin slowly, with no cover - point first. What I mean is the point touches the coin and is pushed straight through, as if it were really melting through the coin.
I don't think this is released just yet but it should be soon. I don't know the method and haven't seen it personally - I mention it as an additional option for those who may want to go the pencil route.
Jim
Mr Grumpy wrote:jim ferguson wrote:I forgot to mention - while we're on the subject of this effect, Michael Ammar has always done this with a pencil and has recently unveiled a brand new gimmicked coin which apparently uses space age material.
The method alows a pencil to penetrate the coin slowly, with no cover - point first. What I mean is the point touches the coin and is pushed straight through, as if it were really melting through the coin.
I don't think this is released just yet but it should be soon. I don't know the method and haven't seen it personally - I mention it as an additional option for those who may want to go the pencil route.
Jim
Sounds a bit too awesome to be true. How reliable is your source on this, Jim? Not meaning to sound rude!
soveda wrote:Mr Grumpy wrote:jim ferguson wrote:I forgot to mention - while we're on the subject of this effect, Michael Ammar has always done this with a pencil and has recently unveiled a brand new gimmicked coin which apparently uses space age material.
The method alows a pencil to penetrate the coin slowly, with no cover - point first. What I mean is the point touches the coin and is pushed straight through, as if it were really melting through the coin.
I don't think this is released just yet but it should be soon. I don't know the method and haven't seen it personally - I mention it as an additional option for those who may want to go the pencil route.
Jim
Sounds a bit too awesome to be true. How reliable is your source on this, Jim? Not meaning to sound rude!
I think it is from the Ammar at the table video lecture.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest