by TheOldForum » Dec 5th, '02, 09:58
Well, if we are all talking about who is the best, then we must all first agree on what makes one magician better than the next.
First off, let's agree that they are all "tricks" and the secrets are simple. Anyone could do them if they practiced. The "secrets" don't make one magician better then the next.
The "secret" is really only a small part.
If you could watch two different magicians perform the exact same effect, then you would see how the "presentation" is the part that makes one magician better then the next.
With that in mind, the greatest "presenter of magic" must be David Copperfield. If you have seen him perform, you know that the lights, music, words, actions, and jokes are so flawlessly combined that the overall "presentation" is absolutely beautiful. Everything is timed perfectly, and the show is actually EMOTIONAL. People write him letters and tell him that they cried when they saw the show.
Obviously, David Blaine is not going to be using lights and music out on the sidewalk, but the things that he does have control over -- like the words, actions, and jokes seem to be given no thought whatsoever as if he was trying out the effect for the first time without having practiced what to say.
For people that say David Blaine is the best, you must not have seen anyone else perform close-up magic because it can be a beautiful piece of art instead of, "look... watch... look... watch."
After watching a magician who is not very good, the first thing people will say is, "How did he do that?" After watching a magician like David Copperfield, they don't try to imagine how it was done until they are on the way home and the thought finally hits them because up to that point, they are "fully entertained."
Anyway, that's my two cents -- Copperfield Rules!
Last edited by
TheOldForum on Jan 1st, '70, 01:00, edited 1 time in total.