talkmagic.co.uk

by **acesover** » Tue Nov 08, 2005 2:35 am

I apologize if this has already been reviewed but I could not find it.

I saw the video and thought it was great. :shock:

Magician writes down a prediction and keeps it in plain sight. Has spectators shuffle cards. then spectator deals out 4 ples of cards in any order and stop when they want. Then by process of elimination the spectator elimanates 3 of the piles (completely their choice no force ) and the top card of the remaining pile is the prediction . At no time after handing the cards to the spectator does he touch the cards. I hope this is not a thumb marker. I do not think it is as it seems to be done to quickly. Thanks in advance. :lol:

by **katrielalex** » Tue Nov 08, 2005 8:31 am

my mistake - mods please remove this post

by **Daniel** » Tue Nov 08, 2005 9:44 am

Acesover is requesting the review, after stating they could not find it already reviewed here, and describing the effect.

I have the Prophecy Pack and its secret is very simple, meaning the performance of the trick is mainly just that - "performance," and it requires confidence in a venerable magic principle, so this effect is a good means of practising your technique in it.

Let's just say that when the spectator eliminates 3 piles, free choice no force, that isn't strictly true.

by **acesover** » Tue Nov 08, 2005 9:12 pm

katrielalex wrote:This isn't a review really, is it?

If you don't have the deck what makes it a review?

Kati

This is the review request forum, not the review forum. Did I make a mistake? If so please explain so I will not do it again.

by **acesover** » Tue Nov 08, 2005 9:14 pm

Daniel wrote:Acesover is requesting the review, after stating they could not find it already reviewed here, and describing the effect.

I have the Prophecy Pack and its secret is very simple, meaning the performance of the trick is mainly just that - "performance," and it requires confidence in a venerable magic principle, so this effect is a good means of practising your technique in it.

Let's just say that when the spectator eliminates 3 piles, free choice no force, that isn't strictly true.

I think I am going to try it. Thanks again.

by **katrielalex** » Tue Nov 08, 2005 10:14 pm

Hi -

Very very sorry, please accept my humble apologies

.

I was reading the posts in the Reviews forum and forgot that I had moved to this one.

I've fixed the above post too...

Sorry again

,

Kati

by **acesover** » Tue Nov 08, 2005 11:50 pm

katrielalex wrote:Hi -

Very very sorry, please accept my humble apologies .

I was reading the posts in the Reviews forum and forgot that I had moved to this one.

I've fixed the above post too...

Sorry again ,

Kati