by Redrighthand » Jun 23rd, '16, 23:05
Mark,
Your ideas on how stage shows go are accurate. It's more likely that people who are comfortable in front of an audience will join a hypnotist on stage. Also, if it turns out they're comfortable, like showing off, or being class clown then the hypnotist can assume his/her work is, for the most part, done. So, stage hypnosis is more akin to social role-playing than "genuine phenomenon." Which is probably why your friend said that in 30+ years he was confident he hadn't "hypnotized" anyone and was hesitant to do so. Which brings me to this point (the "power" of the hypnotist): rarely do people think of a stage show in terms of the hypnotist hypnotizing the members on stage rather than the audience. People who work in a stage setting, unfortunately, are unlikely to use hypnosis in its most effective form.
There is a big difference between a (informal) stage setting and a (formal) "clinical" setting.
In one case, subjects are invited to be informal. And in the other there's nothing but formality.
The idea that Hypnosis is simply relaxation is also common misconception. No one would put someone through a surgery with merely a relaxation technique. It requires more focus of attention and sometimes being "removed" from immediate stimuli. This is part of why it varies intensity - the participant's motivation, ability to trust, ability to focus, the relevance of the hypnotist's suggestions etc. can determine how "deep" a participant goes.
Do you mean "real" in the sense that it can be proven by verifiable data?