by Tap » Nov 14th, '17, 05:12
Mark Lewis,
Thanks for your thoughtful post. I have classified tarot readers (not what we started out with in the thread) into 2 categories:
1. Technical Readers - those who go by the book in the box.
2. Intuitive Readers - those who can use any cards, imagery, donkey dung, tea leaves, etc.
You come across as somewhat more technical, in that you take the card at [yes, we've all been avoiding saying it, I'm going to finally say it...] face value. *ducks as rotten tomatoes fill the stage*
I'm talking about card routines, tricks, slights with the stories & imagery the various decks offer up, but this parallel topic of actual or implied mysticism, intuitiveness, or even what is perceived as actual magic is-whether we like it or not-is of interest to the specs, and they come pre-loaded with ideas about it just like those posting here.
I think that while this is a public forum, it is a fascinating exercise in the preconceived notions, beliefs, and yes-faiths of those kind enough to post their reactions. It runs the gamut the same way it does on the streets or a cabaret, "I believe!", "You're nuts!", "What is this?"...
I believe the best "magic" is that that takes full advantage of the environment-all of it. That includes lighting, mood, "patter" (hate that word), mentalism, and anything you think the specs might be even a little uncertain about. You ever see someone throw salt over their shoulder and say, "I'm not superstitious at all, but just in case..."? I'll bet they are in the majority!
Remember the saying that magic is in the mind of the spectator? Who said you can't play on those prejudices and beliefs? Who said what they bring to you is off limits? I think the posters here have been very frank, and have given a fantastic representative backdrop to perform against/with/for.
Why not a routine that is inclusive of the non-believers? The skeptics? And of course the best of all... the ones who say to themselves... "...just in case..."