Can I drag up this thread again and plead once more that TM gets upgraded?
I'm seeing a lot of slow response times (or even no response at all) which from personal experience is down to one of two things:
- Server host problems
- Bad coding, normally related to some seriously bad database queries
But giving the benefit of doubt, while I was waiting for a thread to load I pinged talkmagic.co.uk and got the following response:
PING talkmagic.co.uk (78.31.111.13): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 78.31.111.13: icmp_seq=0 ttl=51 time=24.615 ms
64 bytes from 78.31.111.13: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=24.591 ms
64 bytes from 78.31.111.13: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=25.964 ms
64 bytes from 78.31.111.13: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=24.728 ms
24.9 milliseconds average. Let's compare it to another big site... say, Google. Now apparently
faster than you can type:
PING google.com (173.194.36.104): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 173.194.36.104: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=22.769 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.36.104: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=22.327 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.36.104: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=23.023 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.36.104: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=23.008 ms
22.7 milliseconds, average
So... what does all this techno babble mean? It means, that using my totally unscientific tests, Google is only 2.2ms quicker in responding to page requests than talkmagic. Yet it took me ages for the site to send me my page? What gives?
The web server gives. The web server has to get the request and then respond to it. This means the web server has to get the code, run it, and send it back to the user. As I said, unless there are server blips happening (you might want to contact your host), this is usually down to badly thought out code
So please.. can talkmagic be upgraded?