Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support
Demitri wrote:Ok - your third effect is Jumping Gemini, one of my absolute favorite effects.
You have the basic premise of this routine down, but I think you figured this out on your own and came up with a handling of your own. Am I correct? I only say this because you have a lot of unnecessary moves in there.
I suggest finding a resource that will teach you the original handling of the effect. This will not only help you build some of the problem areas I am going to mention, but it will also teach you exactly how this effect should be prepared and executed, to cut out any extraneous moves. For instance, there is no need to reorganize the cards before the display of the 10's or the Kings. In the traditional handling, it is plotted out perfectly to lead you directly into the next sequence without having to pause to prepare your packet.
As you look for that resource, here are a few things to consider:
DL's - Your handling of the DL is awkward, and highly suspicious. Turning over cards in that manner isn't very natural looking, nor is the amount of time you take to turn it. A DL should be quick and effortless - with the least amount of hesitation or "prep" before the move is made. The longer you take, the easier it is to spot. Try working with a strike double, push off double - there are many variations (Gregory Wilson's Double Take DVD is an excellent resource). This trick relies almost exclusively on this one move, and without a smooth, quick DL - the effect loses almost all of it's strength.
Relax your grip on the cards, as well. You seem to be squeezing a bit. Let your fingers loosen up a bit, and the sure handling will follow.
This was a good effort. Keep it up. My apologies if I came off as harsh in my original comment. I should have pointed out that YOU were not making any of the remarks or crude statements - so that should be mentioned.
mccabe24 wrote:You need to work on revealing the fourth 10 of spades in the Jumping Gemini a little bit more. It was a little obvious. Other than that, it was good.
Perfelti wrote:well done
sugestion: retape 1 and 2 with a different camera man
Return to Forum of Visual Curiosities
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests