by seige » May 12th, '07, 11:15
I too agree that the shadow version is very unique and interesting. No need to complicate it at all.
And the idea of showing a 'disjointed' fake magician would prove immediately that it's all just a big con, rather than leaving a lot to the imagination of the mystical shadow-only version, where the 'what's going on behind the screen' is left in the mind of the beholder--much more exciting in my opinion.
I detest the type of stage illusion which relies purely on 'big hits'. I much prefer to have a little left to my own imagination.
I remember a long time ago seeing a 'black art' show on TV where the magician dismembered himself. i.e. his head was raised, his torso and legs became separated. I knew it was simply black art, but it looked great, and it was the showmanship which made the magic. Especially when for the finale, the magician's legs walked in FRONT of a white crate by themselves—fascinating.
Any effect of this type is going back to basics—the stage shows of an era forgotten, where pure inventiveness ruled over special effects and glamour.
A sheer joy to see that someone is thinking outside the box of big, elaborate lights and glamour.