by nameless » Jul 29th, '07, 15:00
I got mine a couple of days ago. Obviously, I haven't had a chance to try any of it out or seriously study it, so this is more my initial thoughts rather than a full review. It's definitely a good book, but I'm a little under whelmed - thanks mostly to some of the hysterical reviews I've read in various places I'd imagine. No doubt I'll be told it's because I'm a noob who doesn't 'get' it, and that it's too advanced for me, but I don't think any of the points I'm going to bring up have anything to do with that.
Part one: Priming
This is the best part of the book. I bought Michael Murray's 'Between the Lines' and liked it a lot, and was looking to Naked Mentalism to help me improve my hit rate with that, and to help me come up with my own ideas along those lines. The book definitely delivers in this area, there's a ton of good, useable information for anyone interested in psychological mentalism. As has been stated a number of times, you WILL have to take this information and make it work for you - if you're in two minds about this book, I'd suggest checking out 'Between the Lines' as a taster. If you like it, Naked Mentalism can take you further down that road.
Part two: The Naked Book Test
Possibly the biggest selling point, but also the biggest disappointment for me. Now it is totally clean, and when it hits it'll no doubt be very powerful, but the idea that you can have someone go into a library, choose a book, choose any word, then know what that word is, is slightly misleading. For best results you're going to have to limit the type of word, limit the number of letters, then ask for the first letter...and there's still a fair chance you won't get it right.
This got me thinking about something that Derren Brown (I think) said in one of his books, about when a spectator is remembering an effect, they build it up into their mind to be something bigger and better than it actually was. The big thing about the Naked Book Test is that it's totally gimmick free, but is that really only impressive to other mentalists/magicians? Would a spectator be more impressed by a guy who knows that they're thinking of the word 'That' or 'Been' or something a bit close to it, or would they be more impressed with the guy who can tell them the whole line or paragraph they they're thinking of, using a slightly less clean book test? Are they going to remember that you had them slip an index card into a book, or are they going to remember that you knew what they were thinking? There's even a method talked about in the first section where Becky Harris used an impromptu number force to tell a person the line they were thinking of, which to me is more impressive than the naked book test.
Of course, you can do the Naked Test down the phone, and it'd be worth learning just for that.
Part three: Naked Coin Prediction
This part is okay, but if you know about the Derren Brown 1992 prediction, then this is the logical next step. It's exactly what I imagined it to be - only I wasn't smart enough to seek out the information for myself! I think there's too much risk of failure with this one to use it as any more than a pub trick, or something to impress friends. With earlier parts of the book, you can change misses into hits, or near hits. If you don't get this right within a couple of guesses it's going to be pretty obvious what you're doing.
Part four: Miscellany
A few bits an pieces, a couple okay, and a couple that I personally wouldn't have included in the book.
So, not the most positive review. You're probably getting the pitchforks and flaming torches out by now...BUT, I did try out a few things with my dad while reading the book and got three direct hits (a word and two coins). I'm hovering around 7 out of 10 at the moment, but would expect it to rise the more I study it. It is good, and I don't regret buying it, however, a lot of the reviews I've seen have been WAY over the top (THIS BOOK SHOULD BE SOLD FOR £1000'S!!!! etc) and you need to keep this in mind before buying it.