~The riddle GAME~

A meeting area where members can relax, chill out and talk about anything non magical.


Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support

Postby TheStoner » Jun 10th, '09, 20:51



Part-Timer wrote:Still, the Stoner got it right, so it must be his turn to set a puzzle. :wink:


OK here goes...

Which magazine tells you all about fishing

User avatar
TheStoner
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1277
Joined: Jan 8th, '09, 20:19

Postby MagicalSmithy » Jun 11th, '09, 06:04

Playboy...

MagicalSmithy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 701
Joined: Apr 29th, '09, 23:14
Location: Essex (18A-SHS-Trainee career)

Postby TheStoner » Jun 11th, '09, 08:49

MagicalSmithy wrote:Playboy...


Obviously that's not the right answer. You naughty person.

User avatar
TheStoner
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1277
Joined: Jan 8th, '09, 20:19

Postby TheStoner » Jun 11th, '09, 23:51

Hmmm. You all seem totally stumped. Note that I deliberately omitted the "?" to make things harder - it seems to have worked a bit too well!

User avatar
TheStoner
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1277
Joined: Jan 8th, '09, 20:19

Postby Hardik » Jun 12th, '09, 00:00

Is this even a riddle :? :D

Hardik
Senior Member
 
Posts: 331
Joined: May 25th, '09, 00:33
Location: India (21 : AH )

Postby Beardy » Jun 12th, '09, 01:28

The fishing magazine?

Fishing monthly?

Hookers monthly? (wait...thats something else...)

hmmm

unless fishing is meant as phishing....

it could be magician's magazine :P

Love

Chris
xxx

"An amazing mind manipulator" - Uri Geller
"I hope to shake your hand before I die" - Derren Brown
"That was mightily impressive - I have absolutely no clue how you did that" - Tim Minchin
Beardy
Elite Member
 
Posts: 4221
Joined: Oct 27th, '05, 18:12
Location: London, England (25:SP)

Postby FairieSnuff » Jun 12th, '09, 06:05

Well my answer would be

Does it?

F x

FairieSnuff
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1360
Joined: Jun 29th, '08, 22:01

Postby TheStoner » Jun 14th, '09, 20:07

hardik988 wrote:Is this even a riddle :? :D


Yes it is! Think man - THINK! How hard can it be... (no bingo)

User avatar
TheStoner
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1277
Joined: Jan 8th, '09, 20:19

Postby TheStoner » Jun 17th, '09, 14:56

Bah - you're all rubbish! :lol:

I told you that I deliberately omitted the "?" to make it a bit harder.

The answer, of course, is false.

Who wants to do the next riddle?

User avatar
TheStoner
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1277
Joined: Jan 8th, '09, 20:19

Postby moonbeam » Jun 17th, '09, 16:46

TheStoner wrote:The answer, of course, is false.


You made a statement:

The Stoner wrote:Which magazine tells you all about fishing

..... which is not even a question per se.

I think Fairie's questioning of the validity of your statement, was a good enough reply:
FaireSnuff wrote:Does it?


QUESTION:
If we can sue McDonalds for making us fat and cigarette companies for giving us cancer; why can't we sue Smirnoff for all the ugly gits we've sh*gged ??
User avatar
moonbeam
Elite Member
 
Posts: 2472
Joined: Oct 22nd, '05, 10:59
Location: Burnley (56:AH)

Postby TheStoner » Jun 17th, '09, 16:52

Correct - I never said it was a question, it's a statement. And I said that the "?" was missing to make it harder.

So, with the "?" replaced, the statement becomes...

"Which? magazine tells you about fishing".

To which the correct response is "False - Which? magazine tells you about comparative surveys of consumer products and services".

Fairie was the closest - but didn't explain reasoning. But they count as the winner I guess.

User avatar
TheStoner
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1277
Joined: Jan 8th, '09, 20:19

Postby FairieSnuff » Jun 17th, '09, 17:59

I'm not a reader of which which is why I didn't say false or whatever lol.

I'm not that good at riddles so maybe moonbeam can step in for me ?

F x

FairieSnuff
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1360
Joined: Jun 29th, '08, 22:01

Postby moonbeam » Jun 19th, '09, 20:04

FairieSnuff wrote:maybe moonbeam can step in for me ?

F x


........ and on with the next riddle :shock:


Twenty-six people attended a party: Albert, Brian, Carol, ........ , Wendy, X-man (!!), Yvette and Zac.
During the party, Albert shook hands with one person.
Brian shook hands with two people.
Carol shook hands with three people ...... and similarly all the way down to Yvette who shook hands with 25 people.

How many people did Zac shake hands with?

(Obviously the answer can't be 26 as there are a total of 26 people at the party - so there are only 25 other people available to shake hands with - and the answer isn't 25 by the way!!).

Please explain your answer rather than just guess :wink: .

QUESTION:
If we can sue McDonalds for making us fat and cigarette companies for giving us cancer; why can't we sue Smirnoff for all the ugly gits we've sh*gged ??
User avatar
moonbeam
Elite Member
 
Posts: 2472
Joined: Oct 22nd, '05, 10:59
Location: Burnley (56:AH)

Postby Part-Timer » Jun 20th, '09, 22:14

moonbeam wrote:How many people did Zac shake hands with?

Please explain your answer rather than just guess :wink: .


I'll give it a go: 13 people.

My initial approach was to pair up handshake totals. For example, Albert shakes hands with one person, Yvette 25. Brian shakes two hands, X-man (why not Xerxes or Xanthippe?) 24. Each pair totals 26 handshakes. However, when you get to Malcolm (in the middle - geddit?), he shakes the hands of 13 people. Louise and Nigel have 'paired up' as it were, with 12 and 14 shakes respectively. Malcolm's handshake partner must be Zac, who also shook 13 people's hands.

This wasn't exactly scientific, so I worked it out the long way.

Yvette shakes the hands of every other person. This must include Albert. So, she was the sole person with whom Albert shook hands. X-man shook hands 24 times. This is everyone except himself (of course) and Albert. Walter must have shaken the hands of everyone except himself, Albert and Brian.

If you carry on with this, you end up with everybody from Malcolm onwards (M-Y inclusive) shaking hands with everyone below them in alphabetical order (and people above them too). That is 13 people shaking hands with Zac.

Part-Timer
Elite Member
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: May 1st, '03, 13:51
Location: London (44:SH)

Postby moonbeam » Jun 21st, '09, 12:06

Part-Timer wrote:I'll give it a go: 13 people.


....... correct :wink: .

QUESTION:
If we can sue McDonalds for making us fat and cigarette companies for giving us cancer; why can't we sue Smirnoff for all the ugly gits we've sh*gged ??
User avatar
moonbeam
Elite Member
 
Posts: 2472
Joined: Oct 22nd, '05, 10:59
Location: Burnley (56:AH)

PreviousNext

Return to The Dove's Head

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests

cron