What you're all talking about here is accumulated knowledge, skill and creativity applied over time to synthesize new work, not genuine "creative genius", which implies access to overwhelming leaps of creative imagination simply not open to the rest of us.
Below is an example of a "creative genius" with a history of implementing the most astonishing leaps of imagination by pushing his ability to express his creativity in ways that can take years to fully appreciate. It's not an action shot but a very carefully constructed photograph called
Dali Atomicus by Phillipe Halsman. Can you spot the hidden face in this apparently random collection of cats, water, and artist? That's the level of thought you need to consider when putting the words creative and genius in the same sentence:
Merely very clever or "Why didn't I think of that" thinking is not an example of creative genius. I'm not getting at Jerry Sadowitz, who is a world class magician, extremely funny comedian and Olympic grudge-bearer. I'm just pointing out the sheer orders of magnitude between clever and creative genius.