by Eshly » Apr 7th, '10, 13:27
Can I first point out that I have never heard of a famous British Psychic since Uri Geller. I did some metal bending last night, and it was incredibly popular; afterwards I fained a headache and said that it took a lot of concentration to perform something like that, even though it wasn't psychic.
So long as you claim to not be psychic, people will believe you. People, generally speaking, will not believe you are psychic. The reason for this is simple, a real psychic would tell you what number you are thinking of BEFORE you said it; he would not need to use a s***i or any other device, nor would he need to have questions written down in a Q&A for example (though this can be avoided).
Life as a psychic is much harder than as a skeptic, as there are a hundred pitfalls you must avoid. I honestly think I am right on this, as even Corinda says this in 13 steps.
Yes, there will always be a cult/group following for psychics, but I do not want to appeal to the gullible groups; I want an intelligent audiance - atleast relatively speaking. I have used my Mentalism skills, unprofessional as they were, at Mensa meetings, where some of the brightest minds in the country meet, and by the end they all loved my ability to spot lies in the human subconcious. Had I told them I was psychic I would have been heckled and laughed at.
Perhaps I just don't have the personality for the psychic. But anyway... this thread is getting off-topic.
The point is, we need to protect Mentalism. Not because we cannot invent new principles, but because if people realise it is not 'psychological', then it will ruin the livelihoods, presentations, patter and even the ETHICS of good performers everywhere.
I am not refering to myself here. I will not have a proper carrier in Mentalism for years yet, by the time I am a professional these programs will be half a decade old, and forgotton; but I still wish there to be some wonder in the world.
I find it hard to believe anyone here could disagree with me there.