should they?

A meeting area where members can relax, chill out and talk about anything non magical.


Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support

Postby Jean » Jun 30th, '10, 12:36



Damn right! I choose to deny the natural reality around me.

(On a side note) Ten pages on religion and still no fights, a new record. Pat yourself on the back people, there's hope for the human race yet.

Invoke not reason. In the end it is too small a deity.
User avatar
Jean
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1561
Joined: Sep 8th, '08, 01:15

Postby IAIN » Jun 30th, '10, 12:52

i think you'll find that all down to my mental 'fluence...

effluence...

IAIN
 

Postby SamGurney » Jun 30th, '10, 20:02

nickj wrote:
SamGurney wrote: :shock: Well, before that, I didn't doubt science's validity and merits and acheivements and intelligence- but if that is what most scientists think, scientists have seriously gone down in intellectual dignity.
The funny thing is that from the same source of the above Chaplin quote, he also said 'science and progress will lead to all men's happiness'... My understanding of scientific protocol, actually isn't too bad. I can question science because I am secure that regardless of any empiricism, within my reality it has value. But that is the point, I actually know at least something about science- from reading that, you clearly know nothing about philosphy.
Because if you did, you would notice that science and philosphy are not at all two different things at all. Science is one approch- one out of many, science is A philosphy: it questions what reality is and how life works- but it has different views from other philosophical ones. The fact is that science does not magically jump around questions epistemological and metaphysical in nature, it is as subject to them as any appraoch to philosophy. Personally, I believe there is much to be found in trying to reconcile empiricism and rationalism and none of that gain can be earned if one is dogmatic and does not understand what other people's points even are.
I cannot be bothered to explain my philosophical beliefs at this present moment because dogma makes it ardous. But the point is that I use logic and reasoning to arrive at these conclusions, Philosophers are not just stoners who eat shrooms and make wild guesses about things. :D


Sorry, I wrote that after a couple of glasses of wine, I didn't mean to seem so dogmatic and dismissive of philosophy as I did and what I wrote is certainly not representative of the views of most scientists (Jean Eugene Roberts; I wasn't suggesting that we try to suppress our urge to believe, that would make life quite tricky, I was simply noting that it was a feature of the human condition that we are set up to believe things that seem logical without need for much evidence).

You are, of course, right; science developed from metaphysical and epistemological philosophy and combined logic with empirical evidence to produce a new field of human endeavour. Its existence does not lessen the validity of any field of philosophy, it simply advances a couple in slightly different directions.

I would say, though, that if two philosophies (and I will regard science as a philosophy as you suggest) deal with the same subject, considerations of relativism must come second to the existence of evidence. Until evidence is present, two different theories can be studied with equal validity, but once evidence is gained which supports one or other theory, the other must, necessarily, lose authority. This is what I meant by my post and is the way that science works; a lot of the theoretical physics being conducted on the nature of matter, for example is more in the realm of higher level metaphysical philosophy than science at the moment as there is little evidence available and so several different theories exist in parallel.

I don't think you are a shroom gobbling stoner, please don't think I'm as dogmatic as my last post appears!

:D My faith in humanity has been restored twice just on one thread :D
Computers and wine don't mix, most of us should have learned by now, but we still haven't xD Anyway, I am relieved :D

SamGurney
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1014
Joined: Feb 9th, '10, 01:01

Postby nickj » Jun 30th, '10, 21:23

Hugs all round!

Cogito, ergo sum.
Cogito sumere potum alterum.
User avatar
nickj
Elite Member
 
Posts: 2870
Joined: Apr 20th, '03, 21:00
Location: Orpington (29:AH)

Postby SamGurney » Jun 30th, '10, 21:38

Now where were we :lol: ... something about santa christmas.. the pervy guy with the beard.. :shock:

SamGurney
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1014
Joined: Feb 9th, '10, 01:01

Postby Jean » Jun 30th, '10, 22:07

SamGurney wrote:Now where were we :lol: ... something about santa christmas..


Father Christmas.

And I didn't notice you complaining about pervishness when you wanted to sit on his lap.


Invoke not reason. In the end it is too small a deity.
User avatar
Jean
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1561
Joined: Sep 8th, '08, 01:15

Postby SamGurney » Jun 30th, '10, 23:01

Jean Eugene Roberts wrote:
SamGurney wrote:Now where were we :lol: ... something about santa christmas..


Father Christmas.

And I didn't notice you complaining about pervishness when you wanted to sit on his lap.

I was forced to, and indeed, I do know it is father christmas. But the trauma I have endured... he does not deserve the dignity of being called by his proper name... although, he is welcome to give me presents, that I can't complain about.

SamGurney
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1014
Joined: Feb 9th, '10, 01:01

Postby Wishmaster » Jul 1st, '10, 07:41

SamGurney wrote:although, he is welcome to give me presents, that I can't complain about.

Ooo, the hypocrisy of some people on this forum is terrible! :P

I am the Hole Tempting Champion! Look at my avatar for proof ;-)

Shirt the fur cup
User avatar
Wishmaster
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1029
Joined: May 17th, '09, 23:39
Location: Yorkshire (AH:42)

Postby Lawrence » Jul 1st, '10, 08:18

Old Satan Claus, he's out there Jimmy, and he's just getting stronger.

User avatar
Lawrence
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 5069
Joined: Jul 3rd, '06, 23:40
Location: Wakefield 28:SH

Postby Jean » Jul 1st, '10, 12:04

SamGurney wrote:
Jean Eugene Roberts wrote:
SamGurney wrote:although, he is welcome to give me presents, that I can't complain about.


Thats the source of his power, most other gods made the mistake of one big gift after you die. Old Kringle is smart he knows we'd rather have lots of little gifts. right now.

Invoke not reason. In the end it is too small a deity.
User avatar
Jean
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1561
Joined: Sep 8th, '08, 01:15

Postby SamGurney » Jul 1st, '10, 22:39

Wishmaster wrote:
SamGurney wrote:although, he is welcome to give me presents, that I can't complain about.

Ooo, the hypocrisy of some people on this forum is terrible! :P

I hate hypocrites, and people who complain. :P

SamGurney
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1014
Joined: Feb 9th, '10, 01:01

Postby Wishmaster » Jul 1st, '10, 23:01

SamGurney wrote:I hate hypocrites, and people who complain. :P

Lol! Took you long enough Sam! :P

I am the Hole Tempting Champion! Look at my avatar for proof ;-)

Shirt the fur cup
User avatar
Wishmaster
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1029
Joined: May 17th, '09, 23:39
Location: Yorkshire (AH:42)

Postby themagicwand » Jul 1st, '10, 23:49

Some pagan friends told me once about an evil alternative to the Father Christmas story. This guy followed Father Christmas around and killed (that's right killed, or maybe ate) naughty children. They said his name, but I can't remember it now sadly. I seem to recall him having a very Nordic or Germanic name. Wish I could remember it.

User avatar
themagicwand
Elite Member
 
Posts: 4555
Joined: Feb 24th, '06, 11:08
Location: Through the looking glass. (CP)

Postby Ted » Jul 2nd, '10, 00:13

Black Peter, I think.

EDIT: Yes. A bit racist these days, I think. Check this out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zwarte_Piet

Ted
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1878
Joined: Dec 4th, '08, 00:17
Location: London

Postby themagicwand » Jul 2nd, '10, 00:51

Ted wrote:Black Peter, I think.

EDIT: Yes. A bit racist these days, I think. Check this out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zwarte_Piet

Thanks for that! From the Wikipedia page I found who I was thinking of - Knecht Ruprecht - although according to Wikipedia he only beat them with a sack of ashes rather than ate them! Still, can't have everything.

User avatar
themagicwand
Elite Member
 
Posts: 4555
Joined: Feb 24th, '06, 11:08
Location: Through the looking glass. (CP)

PreviousNext

Return to The Dove's Head

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest