TonyB wrote:Part-Timer wrote:pretty much everybody watches films, even if they never go to the cinema.
Not true. There are some people (myself being one) who almost never watch films. Two hours is far too long. There are some people who have never watched a sporting event, there are people who never listen to music, or read a book. There are people who can barely distinguish a car from a van.
It is a mistake to assume that everyone does something because a lot of people do it. And unfortunately two movie routines in a set will be enough to turn off a certain small portion of your audience.
That is why we should strive for variety.
And that is why we should strive for reading comprehension skills.
Unless, of course, you understood my post and then deliberately responded to a point of view I did not state.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
Ignoring that, one could easily take the view that it is better to turn off a small proportion of the audience and "do the stuff that's you", than to needlessly adopt a scattergun approach that, by your own argument, could alienate different sections of the audience in turn.
A whole hour of film-themed tricks might well be too much, and would probably benefit from some variety, but tying together a couple of effects about something that interests a lot of people (note, I am still not saying "everybody") sounds OK to me.
Anyway, how did the performance go Van_der_Belt?