by bananafish » Aug 17th, '04, 17:43
I have no problem with card to mouth routines in general, but I have to say I would find it distasteful to expect any spectator to touch the card in question at all.
Further more I see no reason for this to happen. Either the card can be removed from the mouth quite cleanly by the magician. Ie, he can show hands empty first, remove the card, unfold it and reveal it,
or, at the very least he could supply rubber gloves and/or tongs for a comedy moment. It should be added that there could be some that would even find this distasteful, and so for that reason. Why do it?
I once saw a magician who's routine culminated in a £5 to banana. The £5 note had been wrapped tightly in a piece of foil before being inserted in the banana, and as the spectactor unwrapped (peeled?) the banana to discover the foil, the magician decided as this was a particularly messy thing to handle for the spectator, he would assist my sucking off all the banana bits and then hand the now gobby piece of foil back to the spectator to unwrap.
The routine was excellent, however I believe it was spoilt by the look of disgust on the spectator face as she realised that the magician actually wanted her to not only touch the paper, but unwrap it. I believe that it made the entire audience uneasy.
Now. quite possibly, this was a clever ruse by the magician, and he may have switched the fiver with the actual borrowed one that may have been in his mouth at that time, but I still maintain that the whole effect was forgotton, and only the gross out part will be remembered.
There exists a genre of magic that seems devoted to shocking people. The likes of the twisted wrist illusion, blockhead (nails up nose), needle thru arm, even blaines ear mutilation. I totally accept this genre exists, and that some will find it entertaiing. It's not for me, but that doesn't make it any the less magical and impressive for some, so if you want to do it - then I say go for it.
But I do tend to agree with puppet man. we shouldn't actually force the spectator to handle the gore or bodily fluids (as he so elequently put it).
After all we wouldn't spit in their hand would we?, so why would we expect them to unwrap a card covered in their spit?