Demitri wrote:pdjamez wrote:I would agree this would work better with patter, but either you don't know this effect, or I'm missing your point. The spade display is vernons original handling, you can derive what you will from that fact...
I've been performing this effect for quite some time, but I feel perhaps my point may have been misunderstood.
I was simply talking about consistency of the movement. This was just a personal preference that I wanted to share. I have always found that particular replacement of the ace of spades to be a suspicious move. The turnover to show the ace of spades is very casual and offhanded. However, turning the packet face up and THEN pulling out and turning the ace of spades over seems too overt (to me). I think the move is unusual and out of place. As a result, I prefer the more casual approaches (much like the handling Ammar uses), where the movement is more consistent with the original turnover.
Demitri, fair enough, misunderstanding cleared up. It just seemed a little odd criticizing a Vernon effect using a Vernon principle. I can see why you would have an issue with the turnover, but for me this is covered by the patter.
Before you think me a complete pedantic b*****, imagine you were talking to someone who didn't know why the turnover occurs in this way. If you interpret your comments in this context, you'll hopefully see where I was coming from.
As always, my misunderstanding.