As part of the creative team at Magic Hat, I am always interested to hear when people have disagreements the website. However, I expect proper criticism such as StevieJ has given, and not outright insults.
Before I begin my defence, I would like to draw your attention to the words of Paul Daniels in his book,
Adult Magic:
Paul Daniels wrote:Most people assume that magic is a difficult subject to get into. This popular misconception is probably nurtured by the prevailing belief that magicians as a body are highly secretive people who would rather die an agonising death than reveal a secret, letting nothing slip even under the most extreme duress.
Nothing could be further from the truth. Every trick, every secret method and principle has been published and is in print. How else can people become magicians and sustain their interest, without access to the literature of magic, this enormous treasure-house of material. Magicians have been exposing their secrets to the general public for centuries. The popular weekly and monthly magazines of the late Victorian and early Edwardian period were undoubtedly the seedbed that published much of the magic we categorise today as public domain. Books and pamphlets flourished, often attracting would be purchasers by their lurid covers. Note the price of the example illustrated here, published over sixty years ago.
The picture referred to is for 'Amateur Conjuring' which cost 6d.
It seems that your insulting reaction to my advertisment was a knee-jerk one. If you had spent some time actually looking at the effects, and the manner in which people learn the secrets, then you would have discovered the access system.
Upon registry, a user recieves an access level of one, which may be increased by an additional one if the newsletter is subscribed to. In order to raise the level higher, several questions about magic must be answered. And in order to raise the level higher than seven, the member must have made a contribution to the community; often in the submission of a trick of their own design.
I would also like to point out that the website advocates the teaching of effects rather than the revealing of the secrets. A stringent review and editing process is put in place to provide this most effectively.
This review process also aims to prevent copyright material from being let through, and at times we may make a mistake. In that case, we are more than happy to rectify it, and remove the method. This has happened three times in the past.
I will also admit that there are some tricks which appear in purchasable print, but these are for classic effects and sleights, such as the DL or basic shuffle control. These are arguably public domain, since every card book contains these. Noone holds copyright over the effect, although the copyright of text is different. In order to combat this, Magic Hat prevents the copying and pasting into the trick submission form.
It's possible that things will always get through. If this is the case, then I would appreciate it if we were alerted in a sensible and mature manner.
I hope that you realise that our methods of teaching get past the possibility of mass exposure: and I will also say that I feel there is nothing wrong in magicians sharing their own material, and teaching people who may not have the funds or capability to purchase other effects.
Everyone who has submitted material to Magic Hat is happy for it to be available for free. This includes several professionals who also sell their own material.
I came to this website hoping to talk about magic in a mature and sensible way. I will ignore the effect that your post initially had on me and stay here, because I feel that there is much I can gain from talkmagic.
If you have a problem with my activity at Magic Hat, I would ask that you discuss it in a mature way and not reduce yourself to having to hurl insults at a newcomer to the website.