Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support
crozboz wrote:To be monotone? I didnt know monotone was a verb. Oh well.
It wasn't monotonOUS, (which is what i presume you meant) it was just that the sound quality wasn't great (which I.D. apologised for). Nothing wrong with the magic.
You just need some more patience. 1:04? That wasnt even half way through!
crozboz wrote:a) If performed live, as reccomended, then sound quality wouldn't be an issue, unless you enjoy duct taping a sock to your mouth (which I know that some people do).
b) It wasn't fidgiting, some people think that one side is a fiver, and the other side is a tenner, so it was just non-contact examination.
c) That "rambling" as you called it, was patter, which should take up about 80-90% of the trick, which it did.
Next complaint....?
crozboz wrote:a) If performed live, as reccomended, then sound quality wouldn't be an issue, unless you enjoy duct taping a sock to your mouth (which I know that some people do).
b) It wasn't fidgiting, some people think that one side is a fiver, and the other side is a tenner, so it was just non-contact examination.
c) That "rambling" as you called it, was patter, which should take up about 80-90% of the trick, which it did.
Next complaint....?
.robb. wrote:I gave up at 1:04 as nothing had happened yet and I couldn't understand a word. I don't know if you intended to be monotone or not. If so, a view of your face would help give the spectator confidence in you.
crozboz wrote:To be monotone? I didnt know monotone was a verb. Oh well.
Return to Forum of Visual Curiosities
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest