Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support
.:Ham:. wrote:Yes, I've read that, but it doesn't tell of all of the illusions within.
.:Ham:.
looch wrote:Hi guys
Ive been told about it today but I wont be reading it as I dont really hold the opinion of an arrogant, elitist, finger flinger in high regard. That said, he can slate the punctuation and grammar off as much as he wants. I hold my hands up, I was naive, and didnt get it proof read...a steep learning curve that I have learned from! The material however, well....
I have performed every piece contained in that book time and time and time again. I know it works and I know just how strong the reactions have been from my audiences.
The feedback from so many people includig you guys has been overwhelming. I include a Quote from a rather well known mentalist...
"I was pleasantly surprised when I started reading SAD by Looch and discovered such usable material in its pages. I get a lot of books and manuscripts to review and many are disappointing ... SAD is not! The fact is this is one of the best and most enjoyable reads on mentalism to come along in a long time. If you are into direct and straightforward routines, give this book a look. It really is good!
Richard Osterlind
I have also been told that the review could be part of an agenda not personally aimed at me but aimed at someone else. Extremely disappointing and also petty but theres always going to be people like that in the world.
Thanks for your support guys
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest