john1960uk wrote:I am going to take my ball home now as you dont seem capable of a disscusion.
I would point out however that I have not attacked you once, you have attacked me on every reply and added nothing in the way of intelligent discussion.
Which is somewhat odd, when a little while earlier, this was posted:
john1960uk wrote:Lord freddie wroteIf you know how to engage an audience, a 10 min routine can be kept entertaining if you use variety and of course talk to the audience and interact with them. If you have the personality to carry it off, you can do amything rather than robotically perform "tricks" which is what you are implying you do.

Actually I'm implying it's what YOU do, dragging out a perfectly good effect, without so much as a thought for the audience, classic case of the magician loving his own routines but not responding to or interacting with his audience on any level.
Clearly you have a different interpretation of 'attack' from me. However, Lord Freddie does sometimes have a rather grandiose style of argument (which I usually find amusing and he is lord, after all...), so I thought I'd chip in with some sensible discussion for you.
As I read it, Lord Freddie's position was that:
a) It is perfectly possible to do a 10-15 minute sponge ball routine, and still keep the audience entertained.
b) You seemed to be suggesting that the people on this thread, in particular Lord Freddie himself, could not keep people entertained with sponge balls for 15 minutes.
You have already conceded that it is perfectly possible for a performer who is entertaining to do
more than 15 minutes of entertainment with sponges. There is a difference between 15 minutes of entertainment with sponges and 15 minutes of sponge ball effects. Lord Freddie was clearly talking about the former.
As to point b), I think you have to also concede that you haven't seen Lord Freddie perform, so you have no basis for an assertion, or implication (which you made in print, quoted above) that Lord Freddie cannot keep people entertained for 10-15 minutes with some sponge ball effects, in the context of a full routine.
You have raised an interesting point about whether comedy and magic should be kept apart. It reminds me a bit of Andy Nyman's comment about comedy magicians (which he then had to caveat in John Archer's 'Educating Archer' DVD!).
I think that the answer depends on the performer. A strong magician who happens to be a strong comedian too can mix the two elements. He could probably do a straight comedy set, or a straight magic set, and any combination in between.
Isn't the ultimate test whether the audience has a good time?
One might think that playing an intrument and being a comedian are things that don't sit well together, but the late Victor Borge did it brilliantly, and Bill Bailey does comedy and music together amazingly well.
From a purely personal point of view, I think that a ten minute sponge ball routine can be kept entertaining without resorting to too much pure comedy/repartee, especially if other little effects are included. A great routine is Kenton Knepper's one from 'Klose Up and Unpublished'. I have a couple of short extra bits I'd tag on near the beginning and end and I think the total running length would be about ten minutes.