by Contrabass101 » Jun 15th, '09, 11:41
I suppose someone may have thought of this before, and for all I know, it may be a marketed effect. I am curious as to whether this might work.
I am not experienced by any means, I took up magic/mentalism less than half a year ago, and am still kinda living in a closet. This is, I think, my first "original" idea (developing own methods for other peoples' tricks is another story). Yet for what it's worth, here comes:
It is basically a (pseudo-)hypnosis demonstration, and I assume that the same effect could be achieved using genuine hypnosis. But for the rest of us...
The performer flips through the pages of a book, asking the spectator to perhaps read a few lines or just take a look at the pages. The performer talks about how there are some things we learn, and at some point, we do them without really thinking about them, such as riding a bike - or reading a book. How we don't see the actual letters, but only the words, or perhaps we don't even see the words, but only the images they signify.
But what would happen, if we suddenly lost that subconscious connection between a word on paper, and a thing in reality? What if something - or someone - disturbed our ability to form images from words... if words remained words? If our perception of this almost telepathic semiotics which we call writing changed to simply observing curvy lines on a piece of paper?
The performer goes on to "hypnotize" the spectator.
He flips through the book again, but this time, the spectator is unable to make sense of the letters. He can be made able or unable to read, as the performer likes.
The mechanics are simple, age-old, and well-known. Anyone entitled to know, will realize how this is achieved, and a lot of laymen as well. As a result, the spectators will come upon the solution quickly, if they suspect trickery, so it will probably take a good bit of presentation. As you have guessed, the book is non-examinable.
A special-made book would of course be needed for this, but that is another story entirely.
So...
What do you think?
- CB