Oh Stacy, what have you done?
The4thCircle wrote:This was more just a sort of discussion of one direction I won't be taking and whether anyone else saw it as a problem which was making the magic community (which I have to say I have found immensely welcoming since actually taking the time to find it) seem closed to women.
Derren Brown has commented on this. He was talking about mentalism, but he observed that really the only female character you have is a fortune teller. I am not entirely sure that's correct, but as I recall he was making a similar point to your one, in that there's no obvious path for a female mentalist to take.
However, I think your concern is really over what I'd call "classic" magic, but I'm going to throw out a couple of questions. Exactly what are the currently used magic styles, and why can they not be used by women?
I think most of the current styles are actually pretty gender neutral. Why couldn't you have a female version of Chav Magic or Dynamo (shh, Lord Freddie, they are not the same)? Instead of a zany male kids performer, why couldn't you have a female clown or a silly "auntie" who always gets things wrong (maybe even a magical nanny - there are a couple of precedents in fiction for that)? Why do all card sharps have to be men? Lots of women play poker. Can only guys be experts in psychology and mind control?
I think that, if you look at current performers and whatever schtick they use (no, not the type of wand), actually most of them could work for women too.
I think there are some issues. The first is the one you mention, which is that women are normally viewed as the glamorous assistant. That will not change until enough women get out and perform. Fifty years ago, house husbands would be almost unheard of. They are still relatively rare, but the numbers will continue to grow. If people like you keep performing, you can change the perception, if you are good and if you do your own thing.
VE Day mentioned Doug Henning. He didn't actually wear scruffy clothes, but his stage costumes were colourful versions of contemporary casual wear. It suited his personality, and he created something unique. David Blaine popularised (maybe created) the almost monosyllabic street magician, who avoids patter and concentrates on the trick. If no one is doing what you want, maybe you have to blaze your own trail. It'd be much easier to copy someone, or have a recognised style to follow, but ultimately, your seeling point should be you.
The second is related. Magic is male-dominated. Magic clubs are full of men. It is partly self-perpetuating, of course, but I also think there's an element of gender bias that arises from the nature of certain pastimes. There are very few male knitters. Most serious anglers are male. One of my other hobbies is papercrafting, and the
vast majority of people who share that hobby are female. I quite enjoy the fact that I am one of the exceptions, but it does sometimes make me feel a bit weird! When that person said a woman magician could use her gender to her advantage, he perhaps did mean what you think,
but why couldn't the rarity value count for something?
Here's another couple of female magicians you might want to know about, neither of whom need to resort to overtly flirtatious presentations (on which subject I entirely agree with Beardy):
http://www.juliecarpenter.co.uk/http://www.julianachen.com/