by Johnny Wizz » May 18th, '07, 14:56
I have small hands for a man and I was equally uncertain that I could ever carry off a convincing palm.
I also asked this question somewhere on here in the dim and distant pass and got the same answers that you are getting now.
Believe me, these guys are right. You can palm a poker sized card quite succesfully but as Lady O M says its all down to practice. And in that respect it is the same as all other sleights.
What I find is that to see that tiny overlap the spectator has to be looking for it. Apart from misdirection, which helps a lot, spectators of the non magic kind are not looking for it. They don't know what you are going to do, they don't know how you are going to finish it.
For example I have a modified Ambitious Card that I finish with a flurry of reappearances through slip cuts, false shuffles and false cuts. I do them quickly and it looks as though I might just have several of the chosen card in the pack.
So my final patter having the card forced to the top is
"So it would of course be easier if I had more than one blank of blanks in the pack. How many do you think I might have?" As I say this I top palm the card, wave the deck out wide with my let hand, give it the spectator and sask him to count how many cards of the chosen one her can find.
By the time he has concluded, with other spectators watching that actually there are non in the pack I have the card away somewhere (depends on situation) to reappeaar it from.
Nobody looks at the right hand because nobody would even think that I was taking a card out.