GoldFish wrote:It's good mate, but the handling needs to be a little smoother. The spreads are good, but maybe they could be done a little faster, and the dirty move looks a little suspect and could look more natural.

I agree with you on the spread speed. Its the variation as taught in the text, so I'm still getting used to not doing the regular version. I doubt you could get it up to the speed of a regular spread though.. ? Anyway I like slow action; I'm modelling myself as the Eric Clapton of card magic. Or is that just an excuse?
As for the move, well I did this much more openly before and got caught on it . I've tightened it up a lot, and from what your saying "way too much"......... Having watched it again, your entirely right, I need to loosen up the handling and sort out my guilt management issues. Ta very much Will.
GoldFish wrote:And just to be ridiculously pernickity and annoying, it's Roy-al Monte rather than Royal Monte, as there had been a few Royal Monte effects out before Walton published this. According to the book anyway

Oh Bo**ocks. My apologies to Mr. Walton. I really should revisited the text before putting the video up.
Is the
according to the book anyway an accusation, Will? Don't take the p*ss; surely you know me better than that? Happy to post picture of me reading both volumes, yes at the same time!!
