Mark,
unfortunately the nature of your banter, whilst most entertaining, makes it difficult to determine if you are truely ill or simply trying to facilitate a most unholy alliance (I'm not a psychic!). if you are infact unwell... get well soon!
Craig,
welcome to this new thread. and thank you for trying to inject some of the old venom and condecending rhetoric from that "other" thread into this one with your comments here. why? do you want this thread locked down as well?
Craig Browning wrote: Perhaps, some day in the not so distant future, the young and angry individuals of our world will discover that it is better to do the footwork on their own so they can actually LEARN vs. asking questions for the sake of stirring tension and "debate" for the sake of a personal demonstration of arrogance and "pride" not justly earned.
when the old thread was locked down, i decided to go back to the first post by "themagicwand". i read his first post, then every post in between culminating in Mandrake's "game over". if you can afford the time, perhaps consider doing this yourself. "if"... and ONLY "if" you can do it with a totally relaxed and open mind, i believe it will change your attitude towards me, and to a great degree towards yourself.
now Mark, you "old devil". so who's the skeptic now?
quoting Mark Lewis: I smell a rat here. Call it psychic vibes if you wish. It reminds me of the tale of Red Riding Hood. Wolf in sheeps clothing-that sort of thing.
i see the world must have come full circle...
some of Craig's comments in his earlier post within this thread tend to echo your's in that when we say "psychic" in this context, we are more talking about a heightened awarness than a fire and brimstone type thing.
Craig Browning wrote: Mark is 100% on the mark when he states that NONE OF IT is "Super-Natural" merely an expansion of what is natural. Even Cayce pointed this out; that being psychic only meant that you were more aware, there is nothing mystical or boogiemanish about any of it outside of our own perceptions, misunderstandings, superstitions and fantasies.
it is interesting in that i read often from you Mark, that you are NOT really aware of what you are doing to "activate" this awareness, nor are you 100% sure where it comes from. Magicdiscoman seems to make similar points in his post. in other words, i find it quite amusing, even ironic (if i understand you correctly) that there is little awareness of how one is able to exhibit heightened awareness.
reading Magic discoman's other comments about hand shape, to some extent addresses the questions i have asked of you. quite logical really (to take a simple and somewhat extreme view) that a professional basketball player would have larger more athletic looking hands than a market gardener from Southern Italy. he is likely to be taller, have a greater degree of fast twitch muscle fibre and (in around 70% of cases in the NBA) be African American in background. therefore in looking at one's hands... whether the person is present or not, i can start to understand how you can make at least some kind of assessment. i guess, and look forward to your thoughts on this, that there may also be some consistancy between one's physiological attributes and one's mental disposition. therefore, i would suspect... with a heightened level of awareness, and some many years of experience... palms can be genuinely read. of course this would make it far more about awareness, intuition, probability and mathmatics than hocus pocus... i hope that's not exposure???
this was all starting to make sense... then you have to go and stuff it all up again by suggesting (in Eckozero's can i have a reading thread) that a line on one's hand can indicate such details as the recent loss of a loved one... ARGH!!! OK, so let me think this through... is it a Pall Bearer's crease??? that should help you even determine the size of the departed. do white knuckles therefore indicate a fear of flying??? please explain...
here's a thought, apart from the last bit... lines on the hand indicating a lost loved one... for which i await your explaination, i can see i may need to re-think my attitude (in part) as to why James Randi's challenge has never been won. lets leave spoon bending with one's mind (Uri Geller style) out of this discussion... and just discuss the 2 points of this thread. the palm and the tarot.
if what you say is correct (except for that last bit you still need to explain) then the million dollars can never be won because the type of phenomena that Randi is trying to prove doesn't exist, is not actually what is being used in the first place. therefore anyone trying to win the million, may well be doing something that when explained fully and properly, doesn't fit into the guidelines to begin with... or put more simply... how can you "prove impossible" what i am NOT attempting to "possible"??? how can you prove me wrong, when i am not attempting to prove me right...? of course that only applies to the genuine (if that is a good word to use... i dont know yet).
this would then mean, and i apologise in advance to those who are offended by this... that the learned psychic and James Randi, are not as different (at least in some ways) as we would have once thought...
just so no one thinks i have gone soft here... i am refering specifically to your comments about tarot and palmistry, and the understanding i have gleaned. if what i have gleaned is wrong, if i have mis-understood, then i am afraid, I'm back to square one. my comments dont necessarily relate to other forms of paranornal phenomena.
anyway, look forward to your comments when you are ready.