by Demitri » Sep 18th, '06, 19:09
There are a few areas where performer #1 needs to improve.
ECC is one - as was already mentioned.
The twirl change for the ten of diamonds was highly suspicious looking. The theory is that the larger motion should cover the smaller motion - but in this video, you can clearly see the smaller motion happening.
Ace of Spades - His shapeshifter change also requires some practice. The glaring difference in positions threatens to kill the "magic" of the change. The biggest problem I have with this effect is the spade pip on the top of the deck. To me it just seemed somewhat pointless. Had the other side of the card been shown beforehand (which can be done) perhaps the transition would have been more powerful. Since it ends there, with no build up or point to it, the effect seems a bit dampened.
#2
The first effect didn't do much for me. The way you table the card in the beginning is too suspicious. The change was alright, but again, I think there are better ways to "split" the card.
The six effect was nicely done. A few minor things with the ECC, but you certainly know what you're doing here. This was a nice effect, and a good use of the gaffs.
7 and 6 to 13 - Interesting application, but your handling is counter-productive, I think. Shouldn't you place your hand on the card that becomes blank FIRST? In the way you presented it, the blank card should have been to your right. Is it just me, or did anyone else notice that?
Cracked aces was fine.
The five of spades effect was alright, but I think this was the wrong sleight to use with it. The Snap Change works well for color changes or card changes - here it just didn't seem like it fit. That's just my opinion though.
I also think you need a bit more practice handling doubles. Your motions are incredibly deliberate and lack that casual feeling. Think of these things from the spectators' point of view. You should not be handling cards in a manner that is completely foreign or unusual to the spectator. Anything that doesn't seem "normal" will invite immediate suspicion. There are many times where this kind of natural handling is incredibly difficult, or impossible. That's where you have to rethink the handling from the ground up - adapt your effects to suit these kinds of situations.
Fading queens needs some smoothing. Your transitions are all over the place. Some are smooth and elegantly done - while others seem like you're fidgeting and struggling to do "something". This kills the effect. Work on a consistent pace - either slow or fast - and keep all of your motions and changes uniform - this way, regardless of speed, your handling won't be suspicious because you're doing the same thing every time. Consistency of movement is just as important as the moves themselves.
All in all, both of you did a great job with the gaff cards. Nice work, and keep it up!