snap change

Struggling with an effect? Any tips (without giving too much away!) you'd like to share?

Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support

snap change

Postby Mikey.666 » Oct 15th, '06, 12:51



hey guys.

i've recently learnt the snap change.

i wish to include it as an ender in some of my card routine e.g. acr

however, im a bit sceptical about it. i have just performed the snap change and the audience are shockad an bewilered. and want to come up and look at the card. say a wild card has changed to their card.the wild card will be gript in my fingers behind their card. what do i do with it from here? i find it a bit orkward. thanks.

Mikey.666
Senior Member
 
Posts: 881
Joined: Jul 28th, '06, 12:38

Postby the_mog » Oct 15th, '06, 13:09

first of all id say dont do it! its more hassle than its worth in my opinion

however if you really must do it then a simply way out is to pick up the rest of the deck and place the "revealed" card on the deck then hand it over. due to the way the hidden card is positioned it should sit flushly on top of the deck as the revealed card sits "crosswise"

Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music. - Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, Inc, 1989.. :mrgreen:
User avatar
the_mog
.
 
Posts: 2921
Joined: Apr 22nd, '03, 08:33
Location: Dundee (33:VAH)

Postby Markdini » Oct 15th, '06, 13:51

I like the snap change in priciple but it has to masked on all sides. I was watching The real hustle last night and Paul wilson done it and he flashed it well to my eyes he did. The best resource for doing the snap change is probley Mcbrides art of card manipulation.

I am master of misdirection, look over there.

We are not falling out young Welshy, we are debating, I think farlsy is an idiot he thinks I am one. We are just talking about who is the bigger idiot.

Vincere Aut Mort
Markdini
Elite Member
 
Posts: 2705
Joined: Jan 13th, '06, 01:25
Location: London 24 (SH)

Postby Barnabas » Oct 15th, '06, 15:20

I really don't like the Snap. Its really unpractical for real life situations. I hardly ever find a good time to use it in a show. But acationally (like if I'm in a long hallway) I'll run about 20 feet away and have them stare at a card as it changes. :wink:

User avatar
Barnabas
Preferred Member
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Sep 19th, '06, 23:17
Location: Texas

Postby mark lewis » Oct 15th, '06, 15:53

I use it as an out when I do the svengali pitch. Not during the actual demonstration but there is a point that I where I have to convince the punters that the trick is easy to do.

I get the punter to cut the deck into little piles and show that even he can make a 9 of hearts appear on every pile. He will do this automatically because one card is shorter than the other.

However once in a while he screws it up and gets the wrong card on top. I then pick it up and say "it doesn't matter. You can always change it to a nine anyway"

Then I do the snap change. It works perfectly and the suprise change gets quite a laugh and a gasp. I suggest doing it along or under the arm as described in Bruce Elliot's Classic Secrets of Magic.

mark lewis
Elite Member
 
Posts: 3875
Joined: Feb 26th, '05, 02:41

Postby mccabe24 » Oct 15th, '06, 17:26

If I were you, I'd do a shapeshifter or an ego change instead of a Bertam or snap change because they clean themselves up.

User avatar
mccabe24
Senior Member
 
Posts: 449
Joined: Aug 18th, '06, 20:39

Postby mark lewis » Oct 15th, '06, 20:00

I have no idea what an ego or shapeshifter change is. No doubt it was something invented after 1954 and therefore I have no use for it. I shall stick to what I know.

mark lewis
Elite Member
 
Posts: 3875
Joined: Feb 26th, '05, 02:41

Postby the_mog » Oct 15th, '06, 20:40

to be honest Mark the shapeshifter change sucks anyway so i wouldnt worry about it!

Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music. - Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, Inc, 1989.. :mrgreen:
User avatar
the_mog
.
 
Posts: 2921
Joined: Apr 22nd, '03, 08:33
Location: Dundee (33:VAH)

Postby bronz » Oct 16th, '06, 09:24

To be honest Mog, the shapeshifter is bloody marvellous if done properly, ie. without loads of hand movement to give it away and is dropped straight back onto the deck to avoid any suspicion over the alignment.

The snap change on the other hand is an angley puddle of wee, if you're going to learn a colour change that doesn't need the deck in your hands learn the bertram. Much nicer to look at although much harder to do, but can be cleaned up more easily.

The artist who does not rise, descends.
User avatar
bronz
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1206
Joined: Apr 28th, '06, 15:10
Location: Ashford, Kent, UK (28:AH)

Postby seige » Oct 16th, '06, 09:47

Well, in my little opinion, I have to agree with Mog.

The Shapeshifter looks very odd to me, always has. I'm a little perturbed about the alignment issue—even though quite rightly it can be ditched to the deck—but still the orientation is strange.

The Snap Change however always looks slick, fast and is easy to recover from. And of course, unlike the Shapeshifter, it doesn't rely on an inverted card in the deck—it can be done simply via a DL.

And I also agree that the Bertram change has many of the virtues of the regular Snap Change, but for me involves a lot more 'in the hands' work, masking the card during the change etc.

It is the fact that the visual change which occurs in full view in an instant which is the undeniable star quality which the Snap Change for me personally.

As an answer to the original top post, concerning how to recover after a Snap Change (i.e. where to ditch and how) there are many ways to do this. Simple misdirection is one of them—thrusting the new card forward and offering it to the nearest spectator to examine always works a treat—leaving you a moment to go to pocket or back to the deck, for instance.

User avatar
seige
.
 
Posts: 6830
Joined: Apr 22nd, '03, 10:01
Location: Shrewsbury, Shropshire

the best colour change

Postby falchion » Sep 25th, '08, 06:32

Without doubt the best color change of all is the Dai Vernon colou change that utilizes the back palm. I have seen this performed at a distance of less than 1 foot and it is by far the best color change of any I ave ever seen. But the guy that did it had spent 2 hours a day for two years mastering it. It’s a difficult move to master but it’s worth it.

falchion
New User
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sep 25th, '08, 06:26
Location: JAPAN

Postby dimabbq » Sep 26th, '08, 03:50

You could always learn the Click change. Dan & Dave teach it on the Trilogy. It's done in the left hand with the deck and has a great cleanup. Its also covered better.

dimabbq
Preferred Member
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Aug 21st, '07, 01:24
Location: UK, St Albans

Postby ricecake9 » Sep 26th, '08, 04:43

Note the fact that this is a 2 year old thread...

Anyway, for other people looking here, Henry Hay's The Amateur Magician's Handbook (At least my fourth edition) has a snap change that ends perfectly clean and uses only a slight variation in method. If you know the normal snap change, you can learn this new one in a "snap".

ricecake9
Junior Member
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Sep 21st, '08, 00:12


Return to Support & Tips

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests