Branching anagram software

Can't find a suitable category? Post it here!!

Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support

Postby Tomo » Dec 31st, '06, 13:39



stepSeven wrote:Tomo: >>You might then be able to ask seemingly vague questions that actually narrow the search space very efficiently.

I can just see it "Let me look into your mind. Are you thinking of an 8 letter word with 2 vowels in it?" Very Banachek :roll:

If that's all you can see then, well, abra-ca-duh! :roll:

"I'm getting a conflict here. Why is that? Why am I getting quite a long word?"
"I don't know."
"I feel someone nearby is trying to interfere. You know who you are. It's much shorter." (Mimes pinching fingers together)
"Well, perhaps not very short."
"No, not very short, but shorter, right?"
"Uh huh." <remaining noncommittal>

Depending on the search space and how you prune it as part of your patter, you're already down to about a 1:3 chance using nothing more, it seems, than vague impressions and seeming to battle some skeptic in the crowd who is actually proving your ability. If you're up on your cold reading, you'll know how to read non-verbal feedback that tells you not only if you're warm, but also if someone really was mentally shouting out - and who it might be.

As Andy Leviss said in Visions, most people think prog anagrams are about pumping the spec. Not so. You need to bring the whole of your imagination to bear when you perform one. Maybe this is best moved to the Members Only area.

Image
User avatar
Tomo
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 9866
Joined: May 4th, '05, 23:46
Location: Darkest Cheshire (forty-bloody-six going on six)

Postby stepSeven » Dec 31st, '06, 14:36

Tomo: >>If that's all you can see then, well, abra-ca-duh!

Sorry Tomo I was teasing there! But I did manage to "pump you" for some scripting ideas :wink:

You haven't actually asked questions (vague or otherwise) in your little script example have you? That was one of the things I was jabbing at in your previous post.
ask seemingly vague questions


I'd previously read the Andy Leviss arcticle: "Things Are Progressing Nicely" and think it's excellent, I'm still consolidating these ideas in my own mind as I'm a prog-ana neophite.

Tomo: >>Maybe this is best moved to the Members Only area.
Hang on, I'm still a noob, I won't be able to follow my own thread!

I agree discussing the inner workings of PA in an open forum is as bad as discussing how IT or TT works (probably worse - I don't think the layman could buy the ideas you've mentioned from ellusionist!). That's why I've tried to keep this thread "safe" by staying on topic: "What features do you want if I write some software" - not a general discussion of PA specifics and secrets.

Peace.

User avatar
stepSeven
Preferred Member
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Dec 22nd, '06, 21:47
Location: Staffs, UK (M:3x:AH)

Postby Tomo » Dec 31st, '06, 15:19

stepSeven wrote:Sorry Tomo I was teasing there! But I did manage to "pump you" for some scripting ideas :wink:

Oh, you rotter! :lol:

Anyway, we've gone to PM so that's okay.

Image
User avatar
Tomo
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 9866
Joined: May 4th, '05, 23:46
Location: Darkest Cheshire (forty-bloody-six going on six)

Panagram

Postby DrTodd » Dec 31st, '06, 17:49

I have been pretty impressed with Panagram at the mo! It is easy to use and has worked a treat for some map tests I have been developing.

User avatar
DrTodd
Elite Member
 
Posts: 2196
Joined: Feb 5th, '06, 08:44
Location: East Bergholt

Previous

Return to Miscellaneous

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

cron