by Marvell » Jan 26th, '07, 15:53
(the term "you" in this post is not aimed at the chronologically previous post, it's an open term)
(AS. there is a good chunk of Devil's advocate going on here to provoke thoughtful discussion)
Yes, we can sell any secret we want. If the original writer can't prove you've just reworded his work or that there was no possible way that the person could know this secret without the writer's work, then yes, you can sell it. So no, there is nothing we can do about it.
It's also the case that Ellusionist and others can take one trick, create some packaging and sell it for 20 quid or more.
Do you believe that magic should be exclusive to those who have pots of cash?
Do you suspect that the pirate and "own interpretation" market would exist if tricks didn't cost as much as they do? It's like playstation games and software. One half of the market sells high because the other copies because the other sells high because the other copies, etc.
Make your product inaccessible to those who desire it and you invite piracy. The piracy market says a lot about the perceived value of a product.
Do you think it would exist at all if magicians didn't sell their tricks in an open market place? Maybe magicians don't want to sell to a closed group because their selling potential is reduced.
It's certainly the case that direct breach of copyright is wrong. It's also the case that some interpretations of work are inferior to the original. If they are superior, however, are they not a better product?
I am skeptical of magical secrets being a monopoly driven market that does not invite any form of competition.
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone and only those without a single copied CD, DVD, mp3, piece of software or photocopied book page participate in this type of discussion.
FYI, the only dodgey material I entertain is stuff recorded off the telly that was never available on any other medium. Other than that, I'm clean.