talkmagic.co.uk

I thought thats why S&M was invented

greedoniz wrote:

Markdini wrote::shock: Sir you are a comedic genius.

Dini I think what he's trying to say is:

That to love is to suffer. To avoid suffering one must not love. But then one suffers from not loving. Therefore to love is to suffer, not to love is to suffer. To suffer is to suffer. To be happy is to love. To be happy then is to suffer. But suffering makes one unhappy. Therefore, to be unhappy one must love, or love to suffer, or suffer from too much happiness.

All to be said surrounded by women whilst playing a guitar under the shade of a old oak tree with one solitary tear glistening as it rolls down a manly yet sensitive cheek

No, what I'm trying to say is that a small brick, painted yellow with pink spots, has never been scientifically demonstrated to improve the flavour of a cup of coffee that's been standing on the bench for pi squared minutes or less.

Well ... OK, I admit it - that's not what I'm trying to say.

But it's about as relevant and reasonable as your own most remarkable paraphrase.

Honestly, it's fascinating that there are people who not only seem incapable of comprehending the notions and preferences I alluded to, but who actually appear compelled to respond with remarks so utterly bizzare that a psychiatrist would probably either give up, or buy a bigger notebook.

I'm not going to argue with such people. They have their reality, such as it is, and I have mine.

oh ignor them, Adrian. I think a horny buck hare has more sesitivity than either of them

Another thread going on the fast tack to lunacy - locked.