by Arkesus » Apr 7th, '08, 15:20
Indeed, it does rise back to the taxation of playing cards, but not for the entire deck. Way back when, one of the most profficient uses of playing cards was gambling. So gambling houses would pay for the deck, which itself would be inexpensive, and then they would buy the Ace of Spades seperately, which would be heavily taxed.
The average Joe on the street could buy themselves a deck of playing cards, relatively cheaply, without the Ace of Spades, but they could still play normal games because every deck comes with at least one Joker.
Time Magazines Person Of The Year 2006.