by Mr_Grue » Nov 26th, '08, 13:18
This is a metaphor that occured to me recently. Perhaps pointless, but it made me smile.
If someone is putting on a dinner party, they have to perform two roles. They have to host, and they have to cook. If you're serious about throwing a memorable dinner party, you realise that there is a trade off between producing "high maintenance" courses that trap you in the kitchen against less inspirational courses that allow you to socialise with your guests. The holy grail for dinner parties are those meals that, either by being intrinsically simple or by consisting mainly of work done before the first guest arrives, are fantastic dishes but don't impact too much on your hosting duties.
The same is true of routines - there is "work" and there is "presentation" and although they are often bound up in each other (or should be, any way), the work will often get in the way of the presentation. Again, the holy grail tricks are those that require little in-show business but nevertheless garner great responses. As an example Out of This World continues to pack an almighty punch for virtually no dirty work at all.
Simon Scott
If the spectator doesn't engage in the effect,
then the only thing left is the method.
tiny.cc/Grue