talkmagic.co.uk

Any suggestions for a small impression device good for walkaround. The only thing I use at present is Shrinks IA but I'm not confident in using it in low light conditions. Anything I can make myself is of special interest. Thanks.

(I'd like to be more specific but I don't appear to have access to the restricted forums - so apologies if this isn't appropriate here).

I am so confused....your not confident in using a deck of cards in low light conditions?

I suspect you are thinking about I******** D*** rather than Shrink's pad based impression d*****.

to be honest, i wouldnt use an impression pad in a dark room.

why not invest in a thought transmiter, and tailor your routine for that instead?

Thats what i do anyways. I always have both devices in my case, and use the same routine with both, so my back is covered.

Jeezus! Can't you folks just call a spade a spade rather than all this stupid code and censoring? How is an old fart like me supposed to lend you a hand when he can't decipher wtf you're talking about?

Craig, as you know I am not a mentalist, but I think, if you look at the number of asterisks you will get an impression of which type of device nozza is referring to (the first message with the *'s, the second is a specific effect where the spectator's named card is the only one face down in the deck).

I'm w*th Cr**g h*r*. Too m*ny Ast*rIsks c**s* c*nf*s**n

Craig Browning wrote:Jeezus! Can't you folks just call a spade a spade rather than all this stupid code and censoring? How is an old fart like me supposed to lend you a hand when he can't decipher wtf you're talking about?

LOL I know what you mean! I was being cautious as this isn't the restricted area. Not that any of this is secret to anyone who cares to visit an online magic shop!

Kolisar wrote:Craig, as you know I am not a mentalist, but I think, if you look at the number of asterisks you will get an impression of which type of device nozza is referring to (the first message with the *'s, the second is a specific effect where the spectator's named card is the only one face down in the deck).

wrong.

if you look at my first reply you will see that this is what i assumed, but nope. impression device. There ive said it, and ive not seen a bolt of lightning yet

It's been said repeatedly that magician's guard an empty safe.

Sometimes I think that, on-line at least, it's a safe where all the numbers are wild.


But then again, the real secret of magic is ************

DominicRougier wrote:
But then again, the real secret of magic is ************

Presentation, my dear Dominic.

Lenoir wrote:

DominicRougier wrote:
But then again, the real secret of magic is ************

Presentation, my dear Dominic.

Now that I did not expect, at least not so quickly. Have an imaginary biscuit.

DominicRougier wrote:

Lenoir wrote:

Now that I did not expect, at least not so quickly. Have an imaginary biscuit.

I'm having a Sherlock Holmes phase at the moment and he's on TV right now!

daleshrimpton wrote:

Kolisar wrote:Craig, as you know I am not a mentalist, but I think, if you look at the number of asterisks you will get an impression of which type of device nozza is referring to (the first message with the *'s, the second is a specific effect where the spectator's named card is the only one face down in the deck).

wrong.

if you look at my first reply you will see that this is what i assumed, but nope. impression device. There ive said it, and ive not seen a bolt of lightning yet

Dale, I think you misread my post, I said the ID was the second message with the *'s, for the first one I said

you will get an impression of which type of device nozza is referring to

Apparently, the impression I was trying to leave with my message did not work

Dale, I think you misread my post, I said the ID was the second message with the *'s, for the first one I said

you will get an impression of which type of device nozza is referring to

Apparently, the impression I was trying to leave with my message did not work

See, told you all that subliminal messaging stuff was rubbish