talkmagic.co.uk

I bought a Dyson. It was great. When it worked. Which wasn't often. So I bought a HENRY. It is brilliant and totally reliable. 1000000 builders can't be wrong! So if your hoover is no good try a HENRY - you won't regret it.

TheStoner wrote:I bought a Dyson. It was great. When it worked. Which wasn't often. So I bought a HENRY. It is brilliant and totally reliable. 1000000 builders can't be wrong! So if your hoover is no good try a HENRY - you won't regret it.

Dysons are too clever by half, which feels for the most part like it's just to generate a unique selling point. Henrys, however, are brilliant for three reasons.

1: they have a face.
2: they suck (in a good way).
3: Professional cleaners use them and professional cleaners know their stuff.

Actually, it's vacuum cleaner. Hoover is a brand.

We have a Miele and it's fabulous. Darling. Sucks like a good 'un.

Replicant wrote:Actually, it's vacuum cleaner. Hoover is a brand.

Poo.

Apparently if you work for Dyson you're not allowed to say the word hoover! To which I can only say......Poo!

We have a dyson and it's c*** (not the best). The plastic bits break easily and frequently and it's cleverly designed not to be very practical for some jobs (e.g. stairs!).

Replicant wrote:Actually, it's vacuum cleaner. Hoover is a brand.

"It's like people who say Tannoy when they mean public-address system. Tannoy is a brand name."

Historically, Dysons have not done well in tests carried out by Which? magazine. They may have improved in recent years, though; I don't subscribe to the magazine anymore so I don't know. You can't go wrong with a Miele. A bit pricey, perhaps, but worth it.