Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support
IAIN wrote:i wish they'd get rid of that stupid fancy display in the centre of the screen, takes ages to load and doesnt really do much...the simpler the better...nice clean code, and easy nav...thats all i want...
Quite right, I welcome messages relevant to my interests and deliberately made the choice to receive these, plus those from other reputable suppliers.kolm wrote:if you were a customer in the past and left the "please email in future with special offers" checkbox checked, it's not spam. You asked for it. If you no longer want it, unsubscribe
Mandrake wrote:(PS I still have my Speccy 48k and the QL 128!)
kolm wrote:For those complaining about high traffic making a server fall over; it happens. Quite a lot, actually. There can be several causes for it: sites sometimes fall over whenever they're on the front page of Slashdot or Digg, twitter used to (and sometimes still does) fall over at major events, and stephen fry is now very reluctant to tweet links to sites unless he's completely certain it will withstand the onslaught of visitors. Heck, he's even made his own servers fall over!
kolm wrote:Alakazam probably sent the email (which by the way isn't spam, if you were a customer in the past and left the "please email in future with special offers" checkbox checked, it's not spam. You asked for it. If you no longer want it, unsubscribe) and didn't realise that such a large amount of people will take advantage of the offer. Which all of us could be very guilty of, it happens to the best of us
damianjennings wrote:You think it's acceptable for an email to a couple of thousand people to bring down a server?
Going wildly off topic for a mo, travel agents and holiday firms have recently been brought to task over this. It's supposed to be 'Opt In' but they still use 'Opt Out' for their travel insurance and other 'extras'. Despite being told it's illegal, their response was that they intend to carry on doing it their way so that customers don't miss out on the extras or necessary insurance. Bare faced cheek but so typical of the way those firms flaunt the law. Bring back the noose, I say!!damianjennings wrote:a pre-checked consent form, which is both against the TOS of almost every Email Service Provider in the UK and US and the opposite of Best Practise
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests