Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support
Craig Browning wrote:Submarines may in fact use sonar but I can assure you, the U.S. Navy also employs the earth's natural magnetic current as part of their navigation .....
science as it is presented on the scholastic level, promote conclusions that are not based on complete or even fair data but rather, by agenda; something that tends to negate the very ideas suggested in that little vocabulary list, in that the actual actions speak far louder than Webster.
Craig Browning wrote:One last note...
Submarines may in fact use sonar but I can assure you, the U.S. Navy also employs the earth's natural magnetic current as part of their navigation as well as detection methods and have done so since the mid 1970s.. the Soviets are said to have used similar technology.
As to the Vocabulary "lesson"... the day I see any zealot from any given topic take on a 100% neutral position in their research and in their contentions, I'll change my story. I've yet to see a single bit of research that either hasn't been or can be tainted. More so, when it comes to the rationalist world, we do know that they have been caught red handed changing "test" results when they do not agree with their personal views and desired goals. Not to worry, this is standard practice in all statistical research, especially when it comes to commerce. But likewise in those instances in which Company X sponsors the research that refutes what group Y's research states. Just look at the whole Global Warming situation and you'll see case after case where this is fact.
NEWS FLASH... I'm not anti-science and I do give science credit. If you were to actually READ what I've said rather than assume things, you will see where I actually state this on this specific topic. Where I draw the line and have always drawn the line, is when the contentions of science as it is presented on the scholastic level, promote conclusions that are not based on complete or even fair data but rather, by agenda; something that tends to negate the very ideas suggested in that little vocabulary list, in that the actual actions speak far louder than Webster.
Tomo wrote:nickj wrote:Give him a chance Tomo; it's easy to make mistakes with terminology!
Implying that he really doesn't know what he's talking about.
nickj wrote:Not really, it is very easy for non-specialists to use the wrong terms when the gist of what they are saying is right and I don't think it is fair to pick on them for that.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests