I hate making these sort of posts, but I have to ask.
What is so good about Dynamo?
Maybe he performs differently in person, but even as someone with an interest in magic, I wasn't that interested in his performance.
Yes, when you are performing for TV live in front of millions, you have the right to be nervous, but in general his skill is fairly decent but he's actual performance and image doesn't do much for me. Normally you get magicians on TV that perform simple tricks (like David Blaine stuff - invisible decks, two card monte, etc) but they manage to pull it off by their attitude, patter and presence. Dynamo seems to have fairly decent skill but seems so dull. Is it because he's hip (no one uses that word, do they

?) and trendy? Is that why he's so popular?
He's a good magician, and I'll probably never be as good and successful as him. I don't want to be so negative, it's just, I wonder how he gets these sort of jobs when I see so many do better. Good on him though

.
As for his performances, the first trick was quite good, seemed to pull it off well. The second one was also quite well, but like you've already mentioned it was slightly too ambiguous. The matrix levitation thing did seem quite awkward, it was horrible seeing how he was standing so awkwardly close to the presenters and standing completely still.
Again, it's probably difficult to pull of these sort of gigs. So, overall, he's done pretty well. But I didn't find it that exciting....maybe it's because I already have an interest in magic, don't know. Would like to hear what others think.