by jim ferguson » Dec 3rd, '10, 19:10
This seems to be a common misunderstanding amongst magicians. Chink a Chink and Matrix are similar in that they both fall under the broad category of coin assemblys. But each one has diffirent origins.
Chink a Chink, while popularised by Max Malini was probably not invented by him. The first description of the effect that im aware of was in Sachs Sleight of Hand (1877 or 1885, im not sure if it was in the 1st edition) using sugar lumps, just as Malini did it. Years later David Roth came up with the idea of using coins. His method (like the original) had a slight drawback in that to be clean at the end the effect had to be performed seated (or using a servante). Michael Ammar then took Roths idea and added a popular gimmick. This meant the hands could be shown empty, both before and after, and the effect could be done anywhere. It is Ammars method that is seen more often today.
On the other hand Matrix, which is the effect in the clip, has its origins in another version of the coin assembly plot called 'Sympathetic Coins' by Yank Hoe. This was first published in The Art of Magic in 1909 and can be found in many places including Bobo and Mark Wilson. While this is actually a penetration rather than an assembly the similarity to 'Coin Matrix' is apparent. Al Schnieder took Mr Hoes effect, did away with the handkerchief and added 2 more cards - thus Matrix was born. Al said he came up with this around 1960.
Last edited by
jim ferguson on Dec 3rd, '10, 23:32, edited 2 times in total.