Economicon by Al Smith
Available from www.merlinswakefield.co.uk www.alakazam.co.uk or contact Merlins of Wakefield for ordering details
merlins@btconnect.com
Price: £39.95
Catagory: Mentalism
Difficulty: 3 out of 5 You will need to learn the principles of the books workings and practise this along with presentation. That commitment will pay off.
They say:
A spectator is given a choice of two books which contain over one hundred and twenty five pages. Having selected one of the books, they are then instructed to turn to any page and memorize the first word on the top line. The mentalist can then reveal the thought of word without asking any questions whatsoever!
What’s more, the spectator is asked whether they wish to change books before selecting any page, any line, and any word. Even under these stringent conditions, the mentalist is able to reveal the thought of word leaving the audience gob smacked!
Everything is supplied. Two specially written examinable paper back books, with full colour covers, detailed instructions and performance suggestions. Simply the best book test around. At the price a miracle and a miracle at the price!
Book Dimensions: Approximately 5" x 8" (13cm x 20cm)
I say:
Ok…the description is accurate…in a way.
There are always things you need to bear in mind with advertising copy. Namely omitting aspects of an effect and veiled limitations. This product suffers from this irksome tendancy.
Having said that, it is a very good book test and seems to be to have been sold short by its own advertising copy.
The spectator being given a choice of book is true, there is no force.
Here is where the slippery nature of English and advertising copy sneaks in
“…they are then instructed to turn to any page and memorize the first word on the top line.” and
“…selecting any page, any line, and any word…” That’s not entirely accurate. Now I can’t mention method…obviously… but there is a degree of passive control used in these choices (no forcing) and a tiny bit of information needed from the spectator. Basically we all know it isn’t REAL mind reading, there has to be and is a real world method.
Now…
Saying all that, the methodology is pretty freakin’ clever! The working is solid and not hit or miss. The books are 100% examinable! Yes, that’s right…examinable! There is always a chance that a spectator, given a number of minutes to really scour the books could find…anomalies… shall we say, but such a forensic examination would make for a very dull routine now wouldn’t it. The spectator/s are free to flip through the books, read any lines on any pages, even compare the two books…they are indeed different from each other. Sweeeeet. This is far more than can be said for some book tests like “Double Vision”, although there are a number of very cool effects in that product that are darned clever.
You will need to commit some formulaic information to memory but it isn’t brain busting stuff and for one element of the two part effect, there is some very clever crib work to hand…sneaky ‘ol Al Smith!
There has been mention in other reviews of the workings being similar to MOABT but I have never had the pleasure of playing with MOABT, this information has not been contested so I assume it is relatively accurate.
One thing is for sure, Economicon is a fraction of the price of MOABT and packs some punch.
The books are, as I mentioned, examinable. If I were to be picky I would say that the covers on the books look a bit “textbook-ish” and not really in a modern novel style. The two books are exactly the same size, weight, thickness and construction…picky stuff I know, but I noticed it and you might too. I’m not going to worry about it though.
Overall:
I’m very impressed. This is a keenly considered product and well constructed. The methodology is very hidden and sure fire. The books are examinable in every way and both reveals are clean as a whistle. Finally all of this for £40 !! WOW! A bargain or what?! Show me another book test like it for the price. They ain’t out there.
Rating 8.5/10 Loses a tiny bit because of the cosmetic design style but that's not a critical issue.
.