talkmagic.co.uk

Hi guys


This is my version of the snapchange, and pls... have a look at it.. you won't believe your eyes.

I'm a link, click me!
Proof

Edit: Here's a new version, for all doubter out there

(Please don't ask me how to do this trick.. I don't know either :S)

IMHO I suggest not to show the back of the regular card as you are giving away the method.

Just do it and return the cards to the deck or table or anything there... no one will doubt about the back of the cards... if you show it you start to make people think why does he shows me that...

(Hope you don't my the critic)

BTW it was very smooth performed

NEJ

Very nicely done. I believe it's the same as Dan and Dave's Twin Split though. Just very slightly different handling.

how the heck, that was really good

NaipesEnJuego wrote:IMHO I suggest not to show the back of the regular card as you are giving away the method.

Well, ok... But remember, that all non-magicians just see a card that gets split in two... Magicians, who know the regular Snap Change, will see a Snap Change with "an other ending, instead of the regular ending" (Don't want to spoil too much)


edit: thanks so far

I know where you going...

But you know someone says If you can fool a magician you can fool anyone

And as I told you before it was very smooth performed

NaipesEnJuego wrote:I know where you going...

But you know someone says If you can fool a magician you can fool anyone

And as I told you before it was very smooth performed

Oh! I see Thanks

I don't get this trick...I mean...I can't give it away, but it seems so simply done. When I watched it, I was like "O....kay...Where's the change?" So...I'm confused on this trick.

By the way


No gimmicked cards
No doubleface or sth like that
No gimmicks like threads or stuff

Just skills

I could hand both cards out

Dominick wrote:I don't get this trick...I mean...I can't give it away, but it seems so simply done. When I watched it, I was like "O....kay...Where's the change?" So...I'm confused on this trick.

I've tried something along these lines before. Just didnt know how to finish it clean. What he simply did was "break down" a 6 into two 3's. Two 3's make a 6

Update... Look at first post



(btw: is sth like that (Updating with a new post) forbidden?)

Sebigboss wrote:Update... Look at first post



(btw: is sth like that (Updating with a new post) forbidden?)

i think you need to do it again, or change the wording at the beggining!
that hardly prooved you didn't use a DF'er. we didn't see either back that time!

The only reason, why I didnt show the back of both cards, was, that they are of different colors... I don't have two red backed duplicates... But I can do a video _again_ and show the back... one back will be red and one will be black.


Again: I don't use doublefaced cards

Sebigboss wrote:The only reason, why I didnt show the back of both cards, was, that they are of different colors... I don't have two red backed duplicates... But I can do a video _again_ and show the back... one back will be red and one will be black.


Again: I don't use doublefaced cards

let us know when it's ready then. i would like to see this!

I will record the video tomorrow, I'm a bit tired (Buddy's birthday yesterday...)