No... Phantom is not along those lines but it does create an intersting stench in the room as well as the ocassional puddle.
The routine as it is described, reminds me of one of the old Spirit Tie routines but I'd have to go digging through a small ton of books to find it. But based on what I have picked up on some of the other things outlined on this web site, it is an existing and established bit of business that this clown is trying to hustle folks on... reminds me a great deal of the old Magus Magic Co. (Stephan Magus) from several years back; the guy would take bits straight out of Corinda and hype them on line as individual effects at $20.00 a shot... alot of it was alluded to being "his original stuff" and it was far from it.
Now if your only goal is to scare the
gollygeewillikers out of them, then maybe you just need to have an airhorn under the chair that you can reach once you're tied, the lights go down, etc. With everyone quiet and focusing on a candle flame and the suspense brought up, a good two-second blast of a hand-held air horn will certainly get them all to jump, maybe even a heart-attack here and there.
Then of course you could do something novel, like "Enchant" those that are gathered and in so doing, plant a seed of thought into their minds, that will haunt them forever and a day after your gathering. It's as Rick Maue points out in
The Book of Haunted Magick, what he calls "Cerebral Magick" e.g.
being able to plant psychological anchors onto a persons psyche so that they aren't certain if or not what they encountered was real or theatrical. This has been the primary goal of the legit Mentalist and Bizarrist since day one.
One of the big things you'll hear me tell people wanting to learn Mentalism or any aspect of "Psychic" Entertainment is to
"Watch the real psychics"... people like John Edward, Sylvia Brown, James VanPraagh, etc. If you watch these people and people like them you will learn not only how to explain things to your audience via the proper wordage, you will see what it is the public expects to encounter from a genuine psychic... or at least, those that they percieve as being such (let's
not turn this into another "no such thing as psychics" debate, that's not the point here.)
It is exceptionally rare that any kind of physical manifestation happens in a demonstration of "genuine" spirit contact, so why should what we do be any different?
Ok, if you are doing a re-enactment of the old Victorian era Seance then you may have a point... if you are investigating tales of a Haunting or Ghost Sighting, then you may have the right foundation for making something unexpected happen, but the bottom line remains what Bob Cassidy calls "Viability" and "Plausibility" without those two factors in place the "stunt" comes off weak and looks like a dumb trick vs. the kind of thing that causes loss of bladder control.
Less is more! You can get ten times the mileage out of something happening in a group of 10 people when only two or three of the ten witness it than a big thing that's experienced by everyone there. But that's how this kind of material work best.
End of lecture
