A video with 3 tricks inside created by me!

Where members share magic related clips and photos.

Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support

A video with 3 tricks inside created by me!

Postby Pavlos Kyriakou » Dec 14th, '06, 17:31



I know many more tricks but i will put em on my next videos :)

http://youtube.com/watch?v=eA1fC46a5G4

EDIT: Dont get me wrong on the title i mean the video created by me :)

User avatar
Pavlos Kyriakou
Junior Member
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Sep 20th, '06, 15:16

Postby Renato » Dec 14th, '06, 18:19

King/Ace Transposition
Technically speaking there was nothing amiss, however the action of showing the card, then placing it face-down on the deck, then thumbing it off is unmotivated and illogical. Why do you do it? Why don't you just place it straight down onto the table? The natural conclusion is that it must have something to do with the workings.

So for this one I'd say go with a more classic DL.

Matrix
Nicely done! :)

Infusion
The magic gets lost in the blur. And your hands go out of shot. So I'd say it'd be best to use a better camera and a slightly wider shot for this one.

Other than that, pretty cool. In terms of the order of the effects on the video, I'd say that it would have had a nicer flow if the card effect punctuated the two coin ones, with Infusion being the first coin effect.

Good song too :D.

Renato
Elite Member
 
Posts: 2636
Joined: Sep 29th, '05, 16:07

Postby Pavlos Kyriakou » Dec 14th, '06, 18:34

ok thanks :)

User avatar
Pavlos Kyriakou
Junior Member
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Sep 20th, '06, 15:16

Postby scoobyglasgow » Dec 17th, '06, 22:45

the video was really good in my opinion

i agree that putting the card back onto the deck and thumbing it off is illogical... but i dont think it affects the trick in anyway (it is a really great trick)

the matrix was spectacular

keep it up

scoobyglasgow
New User
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Dec 17th, '06, 21:57
Location: glasgow

Postby dizzydog » Dec 18th, '06, 03:23

How would you do the first trick without putting the card back down on the Deck?

dizzydog
Full Member
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Dec 8th, '06, 22:54

Postby scoobyglasgow » Dec 18th, '06, 17:18

sorry bout that... i forgot to say... that although putting the card back on the deck looks illogical... it will have a purpose

hope that clears it up lol

scoobyglasgow
New User
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Dec 17th, '06, 21:57
Location: glasgow

Postby Renato » Dec 18th, '06, 19:17

dizzydog wrote:How would you do the first trick without putting the card back down on the Deck?


Well there are several ways if you're quite nifty with Tenkais and the like.

As I said:

Cardza wrote:So for this one I'd say go with a more classic D/L.


Renato
Elite Member
 
Posts: 2636
Joined: Sep 29th, '05, 16:07

Postby Soren Riis » Dec 18th, '06, 19:36

Cardza wrote:
dizzydog wrote:How would you do the first trick without putting the card back down on the Deck?


Well there are several ways if you're quite nifty with Tenkais and the like.

As I said:

Cardza wrote:So for this one I'd say go with a more classic D/L.


To use tenkai for this effect would be very strange and I am not sure what you have in mind. I think this discussion is a bit academic. The effect shown has an enormous misdirection build in since each card put forward is placed in the hand of a spectator. This usually misdirect not only that spectator but every one. There is no problem that the card is "kissing" the deck in a split second while the TC is excecuted, however it has to be done so it naturally fint the patter and the interaction with the spectators.

It supposed to be a "kiss" but in the performance it is a "snog" that would draw everyones attention.

To see an effect being performed without patter and participating spectators is a bit meaningless.

PS. I just watched the clip again and I now realise that the very design of the effect is wrong! The single card you want to change is moved back towards in pack (big movement) and the spectators gaze are more or less derected directly at the top of the pack. Who invented this handeling? To me it looks like the effect is purely designed....

Magic is slight of mind!
User avatar
Soren Riis
Senior Member
 
Posts: 537
Joined: Nov 30th, '06, 15:41
Location: Oxford

Postby Renato » Dec 18th, '06, 19:44

What I mean is such a move is an alternative option, and one I have used on occasion (although not often, I prefer the DL).

Renato
Elite Member
 
Posts: 2636
Joined: Sep 29th, '05, 16:07

Postby dizzydog » Dec 18th, '06, 23:57

Cardza wrote:
dizzydog wrote:How would you do the first trick without putting the card back down on the Deck?


Well there are several ways if you're quite nifty with Tenkais and the like.

As I said:

Cardza wrote:So for this one I'd say go with a more classic D/L.


How might one learn this technique that would better that trick?

dizzydog
Full Member
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Dec 8th, '06, 22:54

Postby Recluse » Dec 21st, '06, 14:15

Looks similar to the 2card monte :)

Recluse
Junior Member
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Nov 30th, '06, 17:36


Return to Forum of Visual Curiosities

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests