Lets be controversial

Can't find a suitable category? Post it here!!

Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support

Lets be controversial

Postby AndyRegs » Jun 1st, '07, 15:07



We had a thread recently about the worst items you have ever bought. But what about things you have bought which are apparently classics, and 'everybody' loves, but you think are rubbish. But you secretly keep quiet about.

I'll start...

Having already bought 13 steps and practical mental magic, I thought I'd add mind myth and magick to my collection of 'classic' mentalism books. And to be honest, I was a bit dispointed. Im not sure if it was meant for a joke, but in one routine he suggests buying a monkey :shock: and dressing it in a demon outfit :shock: :shock: :shock: Now dont try to convince me that this effect has been road tested a good few times. A real live monkey for christs sake! A huge book, but I will probably never use any of the orignal principles within it (there are things in there I will use, but not originating with waters), where as my copies of 13 steps and annemann are and will forever be well thumbed.

Already mentioned room 101 by jermay. The 'gimmick you get given was a bit obvious, when it shouldnt have been, and it seems corners were cut in the production.

Im sure there is more, but 'll leave it at that for now...

AndyRegs
Senior Member
 
Posts: 683
Joined: Jan 3rd, '05, 18:46
Location: Staffordshire, UK (29:AH)

Postby Tomo » Jun 1st, '07, 15:45

When I first read 13 Steps, having come from a psychological background, I was deeply unimpressed at the gulf between the methods used in mentalism and the effects you could claim. Surely, I reasoned, if it's mentalism it should use the mind a helluva lot more. I realise now that I was like a kid who buys a CTW and expects the card to miraculously do what it says on the tin. I just wish I'd heard Richard Osterlind say, "A whole lot of mentalism isn't that sophisticated" before I started.

Image
User avatar
Tomo
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 9866
Joined: May 4th, '05, 23:46
Location: Darkest Cheshire (forty-bloody-six going on six)

Postby IAIN » Jun 1st, '07, 15:47

Tomo wrote:I just wish I'd heard Richard Osterlind say, "A whole lot of mentalism isn't that sophisticated" before I started.


i dont! it might of put you off the whole thing mate...

IAIN
 

Postby AndyRegs » Jun 1st, '07, 16:16

When I first read 13 Steps, having come from a psychological background, I was deeply unimpressed at the gulf between the methods used in mentalism and the effects you could claim


I think we all had that feeling when we first started. It took about 6 months and about 3 readings to fully appreciate the book.

AndyRegs
Senior Member
 
Posts: 683
Joined: Jan 3rd, '05, 18:46
Location: Staffordshire, UK (29:AH)

Postby RobLaughter » Jun 1st, '07, 16:20

Various Ellusionist c*** (not the best)... I bought a Black Tiger svengali deck and, while the sven deck itself is a classic, the lack version sucked pretty badly...

User avatar
RobLaughter
Senior Member
 
Posts: 415
Joined: Mar 16th, '07, 15:46
Location: North Carolina, USA (22:PT WP)

Postby Markdini » Jun 1st, '07, 16:26

13 steps and royal road are "classics" not in my eyes although if S.A.D by Looch never gets to be one of the classical texts on the subject I shall eat my peek wallet.

I am master of misdirection, look over there.

We are not falling out young Welshy, we are debating, I think farlsy is an idiot he thinks I am one. We are just talking about who is the bigger idiot.

Vincere Aut Mort
Markdini
Elite Member
 
Posts: 2705
Joined: Jan 13th, '06, 01:25
Location: London 24 (SH)

Postby monker59 » Jun 1st, '07, 16:42

I hate strippers . . . and stripper decks. That's all I have to say about that.

P.S. Is ther a way we could conceal this post from Tomo? I'm afraid he might hurt me when he reads this :o . Sort of like a cyber punch right to the face. :o

User avatar
monker59
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1490
Joined: Apr 7th, '07, 17:20
Location: Brookline, MA

Postby Tomo » Jun 1st, '07, 16:52

monker59 wrote:I hate strippers . . . and stripper decks. That's all I have to say about that.

P.S. Is ther a way we could conceal this post from Tomo? I'm afraid he might hurt me when he reads this :o . Sort of like a cyber punch right to the face. :o

No, no... I think you should be free to make your own mistakes.

Image
User avatar
Tomo
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 9866
Joined: May 4th, '05, 23:46
Location: Darkest Cheshire (forty-bloody-six going on six)

Postby monker59 » Jun 1st, '07, 16:59

Oh, you clever boy :wink: , you've turned the whole thing on me. Well played sir, well played. For my next move I shall move knight from e3 to d5. :lol:

User avatar
monker59
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1490
Joined: Apr 7th, '07, 17:20
Location: Brookline, MA

Postby Tomo » Jun 1st, '07, 17:12

Did you see what I did there...? :D

Image
User avatar
Tomo
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 9866
Joined: May 4th, '05, 23:46
Location: Darkest Cheshire (forty-bloody-six going on six)

Postby Mikey.666 » Jun 1st, '07, 17:13

I'm probably going to get shot for this. Everybody reccomends it. Everybody says it's brilliant. But, when I was done with it, I thought I've just wasted a small portion of my life trying to read it.

Royal Road To Card Magic

For many months, when I took up magic "seriously" I would "invent" my own sleights etc and "create" my own effects. Ofcourse I later discovered TM, a very nice place :) and i was referred to RRTCM. I bought, I read and i was disapointed. I found it very hard to understand. Perhaps it's because I'm from the MTV generation...know wait...I read Dan Brown and Oscar Wilde :?

Mikey.666
Senior Member
 
Posts: 881
Joined: Jul 28th, '06, 12:38

Postby monker59 » Jun 1st, '07, 17:16

*backs away from the crazed man that is Mikey.666*
:wink:

No biggie. I figured one of these days somebody was going to come out and say they hated one of the three: RRTCM, CCM, or Bobo's. The style in RRTCM probably just doesn't suit you, just like how the stripper deck doesn't suit me.

User avatar
monker59
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1490
Joined: Apr 7th, '07, 17:20
Location: Brookline, MA

Postby Markdini » Jun 1st, '07, 17:17

Oh reading Dan Brown ..... Why didnt you say. One of the great writters there I feel such an inbread now it must be the Punk rawk I was brought up on. But the Royal road is not that good.

I am master of misdirection, look over there.

We are not falling out young Welshy, we are debating, I think farlsy is an idiot he thinks I am one. We are just talking about who is the bigger idiot.

Vincere Aut Mort
Markdini
Elite Member
 
Posts: 2705
Joined: Jan 13th, '06, 01:25
Location: London 24 (SH)

Postby azraelws6 » Jun 1st, '07, 17:19

Wow!... dissappointed in RRTCM... I am indeed surprised. Not that I now own shares in the book, but I still think it's brilliant even though I ACTUALLY LEARNED only 3-4 false shuffles/controls and about 10 tricks that I didn't already know. I find the price of the book was justified just for that, and for learning a way to replace palmed cards onto the top of the deck! (and for the other little tidbits of information of this and that that made me modify the way I do certain things!)

User avatar
azraelws6
Preferred Member
 
Posts: 190
Joined: Jun 13th, '06, 06:45
Location: Montreal, Canada 29:AH

Postby Markdini » Jun 1st, '07, 17:27

Actually when you think about it. Most magic books/dvds arent that good what do you get 1 or 2 useable effects sometimes none at all. A lot of people say dont buy packet tricks etc. I would perfer a trick I would use 100s of times for £10 rather then a book with some reall stinkers that I will never use.

I am master of misdirection, look over there.

We are not falling out young Welshy, we are debating, I think farlsy is an idiot he thinks I am one. We are just talking about who is the bigger idiot.

Vincere Aut Mort
Markdini
Elite Member
 
Posts: 2705
Joined: Jan 13th, '06, 01:25
Location: London 24 (SH)

Next

Return to Miscellaneous

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests