Craig Browning wrote:Last I checked math was math and a birth date was just that... for someone so well learned in other oracles I'm surprised you aren't aware of what a Life Path number is in Numerology... sorry, but this is just a very weak excuse.
No Craig - it isn't. I don't need an excuse not to buy a product. From a European point of view the American writing of dates is strange. IF - and I have no idea how you use dates in the product - the date is written in the US format it would not be suitable for a UK audience. Period.
So, when I use a 'birthdate magic square' (which I do) I can present either with a 3x3 square or a 4x4 square. I use a rapid construct method which works (for me) using a DD MM YY or DD MM YYYY date format. That date is written into the square exactly as the client gives it to me. If I reversed the day and month the client would think something was strange - and I don't need that.
The Life Path Number is irrelevant to my objection - because it doesn't matter which date system is used to calculate it. If the system is only based on a Life Path Number then it's way below the system I present in complexity and fullness. (But, again, I don't have a clear description for what the system is, so I'm not claiming that it is).
A "Legit" system is what one uses vs. trickery including but not limited to the myth of Cold/Luke Warm/Hot Readings, billets, imp pads, etc. You are actually using the esoteric system as it was written without all the magic-buff frills.
The only time any of it is a "con-game" is when the person doing the work chooses to make it such. If you are incapable of the sort of empathy required for doing solid Reading work for the more "just" and "humane" reasons people do them, then you shouldn't do them. But just because you have the personal belief that it's all tripe does not mean that this is how the rest of the world views such things... it's strictly your opinion and that of others that have come to said conclusion for one reason or another.
Sorry Craig - but there is ZERO evidence that numerology (or astrology or any of the many other divination systems with which I'm sure you are familiar) actually has any evidential basis in fact. Therefore, ALL of these things are either part of an individual's belief system or he/she regards them as fakery. When I present, I do so with a clear warning that what I'm presenting is for entertainment reasons only. I
never claim that what I'm telling someone is "true". If they want to believe it - that's up to them but I don't and won't tell them that my readings are anything other than the product of my brain. I consider that anything else is completely unethical.
As a side note - I have an extensive library of books I've studied on Astrology, including Vedic and Chinese, Tarot, Runes, Numerology, Tea Leaf reading, Mediumship, etc. I also have a collection of Astrology software which cost, in today's terms, about $10,000. So, I think I'm fairly well up on the various theories. But I stand shoulder to shoulder with Randi on this - show me
proof.
For starters Zenner Cards were never intended to be used for divination, that's a game cultivated in recent years by magicians (started with Ray Piatt about 30 years ago, in fact). Secondly, anyone can Read the Cards or Stones by wrote... I can teach anyone to do so based on memorized information or canned spiel as it were; they are after all, a language and once you understand them as such you begin to understand what it means to "Read" the cards or "signs"; both, what you see laying in the spread before you as well as what you are picking up off the sitter... I'm not referring to the little bits of body language offered by the sitter (though that can be an aid) I am referring to their morph-type, face & hand structures and other characteristics used by Readers for sizing up the client.
Indeed, Zenner Cards were originally used to demonstrate ESP - and I use them to 'demonstrate' that I can 'read' the client's mind by telling them exactly which cards they are choosing. Very powerful convincer when I then read a Tarot layout with the cards face down....
And you are right - reading cards (or anything else) by rote is simple. Which is why I offer my clients much more.
I think the real bottom line is, you don't want to put in the effort of actually using a tool of this sort to its fullest potential in that it "exploits" the shut-eye market. It's not a magic trick one can show off with but rather a "system" designed for making one money while garnering a positive reputation as a Reader.
And I think that's where we part company. I'm not interested in trying to convince anyone I'm a genuine 'reader'. Why should I be? I don't believe that such a person exists.
My impression of the Omega pad - before these latest posts - and, now that you've added your observations is that it's use is to sell my act to the gullible. I don't want to do that.
<snip>
Most of us having learned from direct experience, what the differences are and why Mentalism -- the hard core side of it -- has little direct correlation to the ideas and philosophies aligned with stage magic.
I see where you are coming from in that you are viewing 'stage magic' as a physical craft. But much historical stage magic has a mentalist background.
And, on that note, I wish you all a Happy New Year
