Anyone here read Sherlock Holmes? If so, or if not, just thought it was kind of funny to think of him as one of the worlds greatest (all be it fictional) cold readers.

Moderators: nickj, Lady of Mystery, Mandrake, bananafish, support
themagicwand wrote:If there is such a thing as reincarnation I think I was a chimney sweep in Victorian London. I appear to have a strange affinity with Dick Van Dyke and that "Chim-chiminy chim-chiminy chim chim charoo" song. It's my favourite musical song ever.
abraxus wrote:how to make anyone sound like Dick Van Dyke, just say the following two words: MAURI PARPENS...
abraxus wrote:how to make anyone sound like Dick Van Dyke, just say the following two words: MAURI PARPENS...
seige wrote:I don't find it odd... given his 'background'.
I'm a great Sherlock fan—and it seems it's a natural and quite enchanting thing that Holmes would use methods such as cold reading as a part of his criminal investigation.
Cold reading, in the context of Holmes, must be taken to mean "He can work out someone's character, past and actions merely by meeting them". In this way, the 'supernatural' power of being able to assess someone on sight is a fantastic way of sorting the wheat from the chaff in an investigation... absolutely thrilling.
Mix the cold reading with Holmes' logic, clarity and situation observation, and you have one of the best mixes possible for a 'crime solving superhero'.
seige wrote:themagicwand wrote:If there is such a thing as reincarnation I think I was a chimney sweep in Victorian London. I appear to have a strange affinity with Dick Van Dyke and that "Chim-chiminy chim-chiminy chim chim charoo" song. It's my favourite musical song ever.
Hehehehe... I can see you now... the Mentalist Olde-London Chim-Chimeny sweep...
"Ello dooorrrrlin'... look deep into my... Um dida-lida-liddle-um... diddle-eye"
spudgun wrote:I always found it odd that conan doyle was so willing to believe in the spiritualist movement, when his most famous character was so ruthlessly efficent and practical. Moreover, in the first actual book (a study in scarlet) when he tels watson that he "iliminates the impossible and whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truth" I always think howcould a doctor, nay a scottish doctor who wrote that sentence, be hoodwinked by parlor tricks. I know about his son, but still it's a curious change of philosophies........just a thought you know
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests