90% of those that do magic do so in a masturbatory manner i.e. for self-gratification and personal delight. This is not a bad thing directly, but far too often it is the very reason why some fail where others seem to move ahead... the one's who fail do so because they do their "show" for themselves vs. listening to what the audience as well as their peers are saying/doing.
Within this grouping you will find the guys & gals who go through effects as if they were water, shifting to whatever is "new" (be it new to the market or something they've recently discovered that they like) playing with it briefly and then moving on to the next conquest...
... I'm reminded of a lady that posted recently as to how he gets bored with magic once he knew how the effects worked... sadly, this is not all that uncommon. Similarly, we have those that simply get frustrated because they can't get the kind of reaction from an effect that they believe they should be getting e.g. the trick must suck (few every accepting responsibility to the fact that it may be they who suck, vs. the effect).
The Rule of Thumb as it were, is to find than small handful of bits that you like and which "fit" who you are as well as bits that you happen to do well, and stick to them for a while... a few years at least, so that you get the chance of building a reputation for being
"that guy that does that thing..." You may moan about that idea and scream that it is not carved in stone but in truth, it is carved out a bit deeper into the mystic annals of magic than you might want to believe. More to the point, consistency is what agents/bookers are looking for when they sell an act; they want to know that you are going to deliver the same basic program they saw you do originally. This way they know both, the content and quality of your program and can more readily sell it to the folks that sign our pay checks.
Those that live by this "jack of all trades" chaos that's so popular in today's magic scene cannot hope to succeed. They'll most definitely get work... I know of many magicians that work as clowns, balloon artists, jugglers, or other things other than what they claim to be.
My buddy Rick Maue told me a story once about an agent who called him for a gig that paid decent corporate money (around $2,000.00)... he was looking for a Mind Reader and was told that Rick was the best in the region...
... Rick turned down the gig!
Why?
Because the agent just wanted some jerk that could fake his way through a Mind Reading act not Rick Maue... the agent had no clue as to who or what Rick was or what his show was like, he just needed a Monkey to Fit the Suit instead of a professional that specialized in a given field who had an established program.
What happens when this agent finds the idiot that will run out to the magic shop and do a crash course in how to be a fake mind reader, is he books crapola which in turn hurts the real pros in the region that know what they are doing.
This scenario can relate to escape work (do note how many fools have nearly been killed or who have died as the result of such stupidity), dove workers, etc. It is jokingly referred to as the Public Speaker's Syndrome in that so many professional speakers will read through a book or two on a given topic and present the material in a way that alludes to them knowing what they are talking about when in truth, they are not an expert or know the difference between mauve and maroon.
I'd have to say that the majority of what I will do in a bit, be it at the close-up table or on stage... when it comes to actual "Magic", most of it is stuff that I've been doing for over 30 years. Not because I can't do the other stuff or I don't have access to alternatives, but because I KNOW THAT MATERIAL... I know the timing, what to expect from the audience as well as what to do if I happen to screw up in the middle of things (which we ALL do). That's not saying I wouldn't toss in something new from time to time... you should! Experimentation is a necessity but it should always be framed by what we KNOW and what we know works; then, if the experiments work out, we can see how to fit them in as being a part of what we do for a while.
Here's another way to weigh things as well...
...let's say you are doing a Mentalism Q&A act as part of your show.
It is very easy to change methods or add methods to enhance what you are doing without the public or the agent knowing a thing. In other words, if you find a piece that appeals to you, look at your present routines and see how it fits in as an alternative to what you already do or how it could embellish your existing materials. This allows you to experiment on one hand while retaining consistency on the other.
Well, just a few thoughts for you to mull over.
